Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Tempestas ex machina: A review of machine learning methods for wavefront control

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.00730 v1 pith:CUPPUMS5 submitted 2023-09-01 astro-ph.EP astro-ph.IMcs.LGphysics.optics

classification astro-ph.EPastro-ph.IMcs.LGphysics.optics
keywords wavefrontlearningmachinecontrolmethodssystemscorrectionerrors
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

As we look to the next generation of adaptive optics systems, now is the time to develop and explore the technologies that will allow us to image rocky Earth-like planets; wavefront control algorithms are not only a crucial component of these systems, but can benefit our adaptive optics systems without requiring increased detector speed and sensitivity or more effective and efficient deformable mirrors. To date, most observatories run the workhorse of their wavefront control as a classic integral controller, which estimates a correction from wavefront sensor residuals, and attempts to apply that correction as fast as possible in closed-loop. An integrator of this nature fails to address temporal lag errors that evolve over scales faster than the correction time, as well as vibrations or dynamic errors within the system that are not encapsulated in the wavefront sensor residuals; these errors impact high contrast imaging systems with complex coronagraphs. With the rise in popularity of machine learning, many are investigating applying modern machine learning methods to wavefront control. Furthermore, many linear implementations of machine learning methods (under varying aliases) have been in development for wavefront control for the last 30-odd years. With this work we define machine learning in its simplest terms, explore the most common machine learning methods applied in the context of this problem, and present a review of the literature concerning novel machine learning approaches to wavefront control.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Santa Cruz Extreme AO Lab (SEAL) 2.0: A reflective, multi-wavelength rebuild

    astro-ph.IM 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    SEAL 2.0 is a rebuilt reflective, visible and near-infrared adaptive optics testbed with a 98% Strehl infrared science channel and new distributed real-time control software.

Pith tools