REVIEW 5 cited by
Are Emergent Abilities in Large Language Models just In-Context Learning?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Are Emergent Abilities in Large Language Models just In-Context Learning?
read the original abstract
Large language models, comprising billions of parameters and pre-trained on extensive web-scale corpora, have been claimed to acquire certain capabilities without having been specifically trained on them. These capabilities, referred to as "emergent abilities," have been a driving force in discussions regarding the potentials and risks of language models. A key challenge in evaluating emergent abilities is that they are confounded by model competencies that arise through alternative prompting techniques, including in-context learning, which is the ability of models to complete a task based on a few examples. We present a novel theory that explains emergent abilities, taking into account their potential confounding factors, and rigorously substantiate this theory through over 1000 experiments. Our findings suggest that purported emergent abilities are not truly emergent, but result from a combination of in-context learning, model memory, and linguistic knowledge. Our work is a foundational step in explaining language model performance, providing a template for their efficient use and clarifying the paradox of their ability to excel in some instances while faltering in others. Thus, we demonstrate that their capabilities should not be overestimated.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
Training with (Swap) Regret Loss in a Single-Layer Self-Attention Model: A Case Study on the Probability Simplex
Training single-layer attention with squared regret loss has stationary points that implement smoothed fictitious play (external regret) and, via a new swap-regret loss, the Blum–Mansour no-swap-regret algorithm.
-
Holmes: A Benchmark to Assess the Linguistic Competence of Language Models
Holmes is a probing benchmark compiling over 200 datasets from 270 studies to evaluate linguistic competence across syntax, morphology, semantics, reasoning, and discourse in more than 50 language models.
-
LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code
LiveCodeBench collects 400 recent contest problems to create a contamination-free benchmark evaluating LLMs on code generation and related capabilities like self-repair and execution.
-
Linguistic Productivity in Large Language Models: Models Coerce, but do not Preempt
Larger LLMs reproduce constructional productivity via entrenchment in coercion cases with nonce words but fail to use statistical preemption to avoid overgeneralizing semantically plausible but unobserved patterns.
-
Towards the Holographic Characteristic of LLMs for Efficient Short-text Generation
LLMs tend to assign high probability to target keywords in the first two generation steps; a plugin using those keywords with parallel constrained generation gives comparable short-text quality and large speedups on s...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.