REVIEW 25 cited by
Large Language Models Are Not Robust Multiple Choice Selectors
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Large Language Models Are Not Robust Multiple Choice Selectors
read the original abstract
Multiple choice questions (MCQs) serve as a common yet important task format in the evaluation of large language models (LLMs). This work shows that modern LLMs are vulnerable to option position changes in MCQs due to their inherent "selection bias", namely, they prefer to select specific option IDs as answers (like "Option A"). Through extensive empirical analyses with 20 LLMs on three benchmarks, we pinpoint that this behavioral bias primarily stems from LLMs' token bias, where the model a priori assigns more probabilistic mass to specific option ID tokens (e.g., A/B/C/D) when predicting answers from the option IDs. To mitigate selection bias, we propose a label-free, inference-time debiasing method, called PriDe, which separates the model's prior bias for option IDs from the overall prediction distribution. PriDe first estimates the prior by permutating option contents on a small number of test samples, and then applies the estimated prior to debias the remaining samples. We demonstrate that it achieves interpretable and transferable debiasing with high computational efficiency. We hope this work can draw broader research attention to the bias and robustness of modern LLMs.
Forward citations
Cited by 25 Pith papers
-
Large Language Models Lack Temporal Awareness of Medical Knowledge
LLMs lack temporal awareness of medical knowledge, showing gradual performance decline on up-to-date facts, much lower accuracy on historical knowledge (25-54% relative), and inconsistent year-to-year predictions.
-
MVI-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Robustness to Misleading Visual Inputs in LVLMs
MVI-Bench supplies the first taxonomy and dataset focused on misleading visual inputs to measure LVLM robustness, with tests on 18 models revealing clear weaknesses.
-
Prompt engineering using order-of-addition experiments: An application to generating two-level fractional factorial designs
Order-of-addition designs and logistic pairwise-ordering models measure and optimize prompt-element order, lifting LLM success on 16-run fractional factorial design tasks from low teens or mid-thirties to near 100%.
-
Sci-Rho: A Multilingual Visually-Grounded Symbolic Benchmark for STEM Problems
Sci-Rho is a dynamic multilingual visually-grounded symbolic benchmark for STEM problems that reveals robustness gaps in current VLMs between average and worst-case performance.
-
DecisionBench: A Benchmark for Emergent Delegation in Long-Horizon Agentic Workflows
DecisionBench supplies a fixed task suite, model pool, delegation interface, and multi-axis metrics to evaluate emergent delegation, showing similar quality across awareness conditions but 15-31 point headroom under p...
-
MHGraphBench: Knowledge Graph-Grounded Benchmarking of Mental Health Knowledge in Large Language Models
MHGraphBench is a new PrimeKG-derived benchmark that exposes a recognition-to-judgment gap in 15 LLMs on mental health tasks while stressing that results measure KG agreement under constrained interfaces, not clinical...
-
DiagnosticIQ: A Benchmark for LLM-Based Industrial Maintenance Action Recommendation from Symbolic Rules
DiagnosticIQ benchmark shows frontier LLMs perform similarly on standard rule-to-action tasks but lose substantial accuracy under distractor expansion and condition inversion, pointing to calibration as the key deploy...
-
Instruction Complexity Induces Positional Collapse in Adversarial LLM Evaluation
Complex adversarial instructions induce positional collapse in LLMs, with extreme cases showing 99.9% concentration on a single response position and zero content sensitivity.
-
TRIP-Evaluate: An Open Multimodal Benchmark for Evaluating Large Models in Transportation
TRIP-Evaluate is a new open multimodal benchmark with 837 text, image, and point-cloud items organized by a role-task-knowledge taxonomy to evaluate large models on transportation workflows.
-
AI Achieves a Perfect LSAT Score
Language models achieve a perfect LSAT score, with experiments showing that internal thinking phases and a fine-tuned process reward model are key to high performance on logical reasoning questions.
-
Reliability Scaling Laws for Quantized Large Language Models
Reliability of quantized LLMs peaks nonlinearly at 4-bit precision under fixed total model bits, while accuracy scales monotonically, and quantization can improve robustness to natural perturbations.
-
When LLMs Agree, Are They Right? Auditing Self-Consistency and Cross-Model Agreement as Confidence Signals
Across 265,000 samples on GPQA and AIME, LLM self-consistency is a positive but weak predictor of correctness (ρ 0.20–0.59), with frontier models showing the worst over-confidence and confident errors recurring across...
-
YOMI-Bench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Kanji Reading and Phonological Understanding of LLMs for Japanese
YOMI-Bench is a new benchmark of four tasks for kanji reading and phonological understanding in LLMs, showing low performance even for Japanese-specific and commercial models.
-
PRIME: Evaluating Prompt Resolution Under Incompatible Instructions in LLMs
PRIME is a new evaluation framework that creates calibrated conflicts in LLM prompts and finds conflict type affects model behavior more than scale.
-
SafetyRepro: Configuration-Conditional Rank Instability on Alignment Benchmarks
Configuration choices alone flip pairwise safety verdicts on every tested alignment benchmark, isolated via a finite-envelope proposition linking disagreement rate to strict ordering reversal.
-
TS-Skill: A Benchmark for Evaluating Analytical Skills in Time-Series Question Answering
Presents TS-Skill benchmark and SKEvol construction framework to diagnose three composable analytical skills in time-series QA across LLMs and TSLMs.
-
Logit-Attention Divergence: Mitigating Position Bias in Multi-Image Retrieval via Attention-Guided Calibration
A training-free attention-guided debiasing framework mitigates position bias in MLLM multi-image retrieval by exploiting the observed mismatch between biased logits and aligned attention maps, yielding over 40% accura...
-
Beyond Accuracy: Policy Invariance as a Reliability Test for LLM Safety Judges
LLM safety judges flip verdicts on equivalent policy rewrites up to 9.1% of the time and cannot distinguish meaningful from meaningless changes, requiring new invariance-based reliability metrics.
-
Do Large Language Models Plan Answer Positions? Position Bias in Multiple-Choice Question Generation
LLMs implicitly plan answer positions during MCQ generation, as shown by predictive signals in hidden representations and controllable shifts via activation steering.
-
MANTA: Multi-turn Assessment for Nonhuman Thinking & Alignment
MANTA is a new multi-turn dynamic benchmark that stress-tests frontier LLMs on animal welfare alignment by generating targeted adversarial follow-ups and scoring across 13 dimensions, with preliminary results showing ...
-
Beyond Text-Dominance: Understanding Modality Preference of Omni-modal Large Language Models
Omni-modal LLMs exhibit visual preference that emerges in mid-to-late layers, enabling hallucination detection without task-specific training.
-
SciHorizon-GENE: Benchmarking LLM for Life Sciences Inference from Gene Knowledge to Functional Understanding
SciHorizon-GENE is a large-scale benchmark evaluating LLMs on gene-to-function inference across four perspectives, revealing heterogeneity and challenges in faithful, complete, literature-grounded outputs.
-
Characterizing initial human-AI proof formalization workflows
A controlled user study and qualitative survey find that AI assistance raises formalization accuracy for math proofs, with users flexibly combining multiple tools while retaining oversight.
-
Position: AI Evaluations Should be Grounded on a Theory of Capability
AI evaluations should be reframed as inference tasks grounded in an explicit theory of capability, with an empirical demonstration that results depend on modeling assumptions and a proposed Evaluation Card for transparency.
-
Threat Modelling using Domain-Adapted Language Models: Empirical Evaluation and Insights
Domain-adapted LLMs and SLMs do not consistently outperform general models on STRIDE threat classification for 5G, with decoding strategies and model scale affecting validity but gains remaining insufficient for reliable use.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.