Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

When Less is More: Investigating Data Pruning for Pretraining LLMs at Scale

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.04564 v1 pith:P3CCYFWM submitted 2023-09-08 cs.CL cs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords datapretrainingqualitydatasetsllmscomputationallycorporaestimates
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large volumes of text data have contributed significantly to the development of large language models (LLMs) in recent years. This data is typically acquired by scraping the internet, leading to pretraining datasets comprised of noisy web text. To date, efforts to prune these datasets down to a higher quality subset have relied on hand-crafted heuristics encoded as rule-based filters. In this work, we take a wider view and explore scalable estimates of data quality that can be used to systematically measure the quality of pretraining data. We perform a rigorous comparison at scale of the simple data quality estimator of perplexity, as well as more sophisticated and computationally intensive estimates of the Error L2-Norm and memorization. These metrics are used to rank and prune pretraining corpora, and we subsequently compare LLMs trained on these pruned datasets. Surprisingly, we find that the simple technique of perplexity outperforms our more computationally expensive scoring methods. We improve over our no-pruning baseline while training on as little as 30% of the original training dataset. Our work sets the foundation for unexplored strategies in automatically curating high quality corpora and suggests the majority of pretraining data can be removed while retaining performance.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 7 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. OPERA: Online Data Pruning for Efficient Retrieval Model Adaptation

    cs.IR 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Dynamic hierarchical data pruning improves NDCG@10 and Recall@20 for dense retrievers while reaching full performance in half the iterations.

  2. Language Models Improve When Pretraining Data Matches Target Tasks

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Ranking pretraining documents by similarity to benchmark training examples (BETR) yields consistent benchmark gains and a 2.1x compute multiplier over DCLM-Baseline.

  3. Disentangling the Roles of Representation and Selection in Data Pruning

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In NLP data pruning, the representation used to score examples (especially gradients) influences selected data and downstream performance more than the selection algorithm, and difficulty-oriented algorithms often do ...

  4. ADMIRE-BayesOpt: Accelerated Data MIxture RE-weighting for Language Models with Bayesian Optimization

    stat.ML 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Using Bayesian optimization over Gaussian-process surrogates, data mixtures for LLM training can be found much faster than with linear or exponential regression baselines, including across model sizes.

  5. From Data to Device: ELMOD An Efficient German-First 2.7B Language Model for Mobile Inference

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A 2.7B German-first LLM trained cheaply on public data with language-specific quality filtering matches larger 7B models on German reasoning benchmarks and runs on-device.

Pith tools