REVIEW 1 cited by
Incentive-Based Software Security: Fair Micro-Payments for Writing Secure Code
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Incentive-Based Software Security: Fair Micro-Payments for Writing Secure Code
read the original abstract
We describe a mechanism to create fair and explainable incentives for software developers to reward contributions to security of a product. We use cooperative game theory to model the actions of the developer team inside a risk management workflow, considering the team to actively work against known threats, and thereby receive micro-payments based on their performance. The use of the Shapley-value provides natural explanations here directly through (new) interpretations of the axiomatic grounding of the imputation. The resulting mechanism is straightforward to implement, and relies on standard tools from collaborative software development, such as are available for git repositories and mining thereof. The micropayment model itself is deterministic and does not rely on uncertain information outside the scope of the developer team or the enterprise, hence is void of assumptions about adversarial incentives, or user behavior, up to their role in the risk management process that the mechanism is part of. We corroborate our model with a worked example based on real-life data.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Security Incentivization: An Empirical Study of how Micropayments Impact Code Security
Linking team bonuses to automated security scan results reduced issue density in a controlled experiment with 84 students across 14 teams.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.