REVIEW 2 cited by
Generative AI Text Classification using Ensemble LLM Approaches
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown impressive performance across a variety of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and natural language processing tasks, such as content creation, report generation, etc. However, unregulated malign application of these models can create undesirable consequences such as generation of fake news, plagiarism, etc. As a result, accurate detection of AI-generated language can be crucial in responsible usage of LLMs. In this work, we explore 1) whether a certain body of text is AI generated or written by human, and 2) attribution of a specific language model in generating a body of text. Texts in both English and Spanish are considered. The datasets used in this study are provided as part of the Automated Text Identification (AuTexTification) shared task. For each of the research objectives stated above, we propose an ensemble neural model that generates probabilities from different pre-trained LLMs which are used as features to a Traditional Machine Learning (TML) classifier following it. For the first task of distinguishing between AI and human generated text, our model ranked in fifth and thirteenth place (with macro $F1$ scores of 0.733 and 0.649) for English and Spanish texts, respectively. For the second task on model attribution, our model ranked in first place with macro $F1$ scores of 0.625 and 0.653 for English and Spanish texts, respectively.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Evaluating LLMs and Prompting Strategies for Automated Hardware Diagnosis from Textual User-Reports
A benchmark of 29 LLMs and four prompting strategies for classifying faulty computer components from user reports, finding that small models like gemma-2-2b match larger ones.
-
Enhancing RAG with Active Learning on Conversation Records: Reject Incapables and Answer Capables
AL4RAG uses a retrieval-aware similarity metric to select annotation-worthy RAG conversation records, yielding DPO-trained models that reject hallucination-prone queries and preserve answer quality.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.