REVIEW 3 cited by
Estimating Contamination via Perplexity: Quantifying Memorisation in Language Model Evaluation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Data contamination in model evaluation is getting increasingly prevalent as the massive training corpora of large language models often unintentionally include benchmark samples. Therefore, contamination analysis has became an inevitable part of reliable model evaluation. However, existing method of contamination analysis requires the access of the entire training data which is often confidential for recent models. This prevent the community to rigorously audit these models and conduct accurate assessment of their capability. In this paper, we propose a novel method to quantify contamination without the access of the full training set, that measure the extent of contamination with perplexity. Our analysis provides evidence of significant memorisation of recent foundation models in popular reading comprehension, summarisation benchmarks, while multiple choice appears less contaminated.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Predicting Task Difficulty Without Rollouts
Pre-rollout task difficulty for agentic benchmarks is predictable from token-level entropy features, with Spearman rho=0.399 in-distribution and 0.225 out-of-distribution.
-
Establishing Trustworthy LLM Evaluation via Shortcut Neuron Analysis
Shortcut neuron patching suppresses benchmark-contamination shortcuts in LLMs and yields evaluation scores that strongly correlate with the external MixEval benchmark.
-
Simulating Training Data Leakage in Multiple-Choice Benchmarks for LLM Evaluation
Under simulated leakage, n-gram-based detection beats permutation and truncation methods, and cleaning flag-prone MMLU instances changes model rankings only slightly.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.