Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

The Topology and Geometry of Neural Representations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.11028 v3 pith:L7H6STPC submitted 2023-09-20 q-bio.NC cs.LGstat.ME

classification q-bio.NCcs.LGstat.ME
keywords differentgeometryrepresentationalrepresentationsbraintopologymodelmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

A central question for neuroscience is how to characterize brain representations of perceptual and cognitive content. An ideal characterization should distinguish different functional regions with robustness to noise and idiosyncrasies of individual brains that do not correspond to computational differences. Previous studies have characterized brain representations by their representational geometry, which is defined by the representational dissimilarity matrix (RDM), a summary statistic that abstracts from the roles of individual neurons (or responses channels) and characterizes the discriminability of stimuli. Here we explore a further step of abstraction: from the geometry to the topology of brain representations. We propose topological representational similarity analysis (tRSA), an extension of representational similarity analysis (RSA) that uses a family of geo-topological summary statistics that generalizes the RDM to characterize the topology while de-emphasizing the geometry. We evaluate this new family of statistics in terms of the sensitivity and specificity for model selection using both simulations and fMRI data. In the simulations, the ground truth is a data-generating layer representation in a neural network model and the models are the same and other layers in different model instances (trained from different random seeds). In fMRI, the ground truth is a visual area and the models are the same and other areas measured in different subjects. Results show that topology-sensitive characterizations of population codes are robust to noise and interindividual variability and maintain excellent sensitivity to the unique representational signatures of different neural network layers and brain regions. These methods enable researchers to calibrate comparisons among representations in brains and models to be sensitive to the geometry, the topology, or a combination of both.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Algorithm Development in Neural Networks: Insights from the Streaming Parity Task

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    RNNs trained on short parity sequences can suddenly generalize to arbitrary length by merging hidden states that agree on future outputs, forming a finite automaton.

  2. Can Biologically Plausible Temporal Credit Assignment Rules Match BPTT for Neural Similarity? E-prop as an Example

    cs.NE 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    At matched task accuracy, e-prop trained RNNs reach neural data similarity comparable to BPTT trained RNNs on Mante 2013 and Sussillo 2015 datasets, with initialization and architecture influencing similarity more tha...

Pith tools