Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

HoneyBee: Progressive Instruction Finetuning of Large Language Models for Materials Science

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.08511 v1 pith:IFBHADW2 submitted 2023-10-12 cs.CL cond-mat.mtrl-scics.AI

classification cs.CLcond-mat.mtrl-scics.AI
keywords materialssciencehoneybeelanguagedatamatsci-instructmodelsavailable
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We propose an instruction-based process for trustworthy data curation in materials science (MatSci-Instruct), which we then apply to finetune a LLaMa-based language model targeted for materials science (HoneyBee). MatSci-Instruct helps alleviate the scarcity of relevant, high-quality materials science textual data available in the open literature, and HoneyBee is the first billion-parameter language model specialized to materials science. In MatSci-Instruct we improve the trustworthiness of generated data by prompting multiple commercially available large language models for generation with an Instructor module (e.g. Chat-GPT) and verification from an independent Verifier module (e.g. Claude). Using MatSci-Instruct, we construct a dataset of multiple tasks and measure the quality of our dataset along multiple dimensions, including accuracy against known facts, relevance to materials science, as well as completeness and reasonableness of the data. Moreover, we iteratively generate more targeted instructions and instruction-data in a finetuning-evaluation-feedback loop leading to progressively better performance for our finetuned HoneyBee models. Our evaluation on the MatSci-NLP benchmark shows HoneyBee's outperformance of existing language models on materials science tasks and iterative improvement in successive stages of instruction-data refinement. We study the quality of HoneyBee's language modeling through automatic evaluation and analyze case studies to further understand the model's capabilities and limitations. Our code and relevant datasets are publicly available at \url{https://github.com/BangLab-UdeM-Mila/NLP4MatSci-HoneyBee}.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Incorporating Domain Knowledge into Materials Tokenization

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A domain-knowledge-weighted tokenizer, MATTER, preserves material concepts and improves materials NLP performance by 4% on generation and 2% on classification tasks.

  2. ScienceMeter: Tracking Scientific Knowledge Updates in Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-05 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    ScienceMeter evaluates language model knowledge updates across three axes, preservation of old scientific claims, acquisition of new claims, and projection to future findings, and finds all current methods fall short.

  3. Seeing Beyond Words: MatVQA for Challenging Visual-Scientific Reasoning in Materials Science

    cs.CE 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    MatVQA is a new materials-science visual QA benchmark with automated shortcut removal, and current multimodal LLMs score at most about 52% on it.

  4. A Survey of AI for Materials Science: Foundation Models, LLM Agents, Datasets, and Tools

    cs.LG 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    This survey organizes foundation models, LLM agents, datasets, and tools in materials science into six task areas.

Pith tools