REVIEW 4 cited by
Testing the cosmological principle with the Pantheon+ sample and the region-fitting method
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Testing the cosmological principle with the Pantheon+ sample and the region-fitting method
read the original abstract
The cosmological principle is fundamental to the standard cosmological model. It assumes that the Universe is homogeneous and isotropic on very large scales. As the basic assumption, it must stand the test of various observations. In this work, using the region fitting (RF) method, we mapped the all-sky distribution of cosmological parameters ($\Omega_{m}$ and $H_{0}$) and find that the distribution significantly deviates from isotropy. A local matter underdensity region exists toward (${308.4^{\circ}}$$_{-48.7}^{+47.6}$, ${-18.2^{\circ}}$$_{-28.8}^{+21.1}$) as well as a preferred direction of the cosmic anisotropy (${313.4^{\circ}}$$_{-18.2}^{+19.6}$, ${-16.8^{\circ}}$$_{-10.7}^{+11.1}$) in galactic coordinates. Similar directions may imply that local matter density might be responsible for the anisotropy of the accelerated expansion of the Universe. Results of statistical isotropy analyses including Isotropy and Isotropy with real-data positions (RP) show high confidence levels. For the local matter underdensity, the statistical significances are 2.78$\sigma$ (isotropy) and 2.34$\sigma$ (isotropy RP). For the cosmic anisotropy, the statistical significances are 3.96$\sigma$ (isotropy) and 3.15$\sigma$ (isotropy RP). The comparison of these two kinds of statistical isotropy analyses suggests that inhomogeneous spatial distribution of real sample can increase the deviation from isotropy. The similar results and findings are also found from reanalyses of the low-redshift sample (lp+) and the lower screening angle ($\theta_\mathrm{max}$ = 60$^{\circ}$), but with a slight decrease in statistical significance. Overall, our results provide clear indications for a possible cosmic anisotropy. This possibility must be taken seriously. Further testing is needed to better understand this signal.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Hubble tension in k-essence: Evidence for robust tension alleviation
Dilaton and tachyon k-essence models robustly reduce Planck–late-Universe H0 tension to 0.14σ and 0.69σ without dataset-dependent fine-tuning of model parameters.
-
New constraints on cosmic anisotropy from galaxy clusters using an improved dipole fitting method
Galaxy cluster observations yield two preferred directions with cosmic anisotropy amplitude of about 5.3 times 10 to the minus 4 at roughly 1 sigma overall significance, though higher in the XMM-Newton subsample.
-
Impact of the SNe Ia Magnitude Transition at 20 Mpc on Cosmological Parameter Estimation
A 0.19 mag step in supernova absolute magnitude at 20 Mpc improves data fit and increases the Hubble constant by 2% while leaving matter density and dark energy parameters stable.
-
Probing cosmic anisotropy with galaxy clusters and supernovae
Analysis of galaxy cluster and supernova data reveals a ~2σ directional variation in the Hubble constant, robust across calibration methods and aligned with the CMB dipole.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.