Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

RCAgent: Cloud Root Cause Analysis by Autonomous Agents with Tool-Augmented Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.16340 v3 pith:ANEI2YAX submitted 2023-10-25 cs.SE cs.CL

RCAgent: Cloud Root Cause Analysis by Autonomous Agents with Tool-Augmented Large Language Models

classification cs.SE cs.CL
keywords rcagentanalysiscloudrootautonomousbeencausecurrent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Large language model (LLM) applications in cloud root cause analysis (RCA) have been actively explored recently. However, current methods are still reliant on manual workflow settings and do not unleash LLMs' decision-making and environment interaction capabilities. We present RCAgent, a tool-augmented LLM autonomous agent framework for practical and privacy-aware industrial RCA usage. Running on an internally deployed model rather than GPT families, RCAgent is capable of free-form data collection and comprehensive analysis with tools. Our framework combines a variety of enhancements, including a unique Self-Consistency for action trajectories, and a suite of methods for context management, stabilization, and importing domain knowledge. Our experiments show RCAgent's evident and consistent superiority over ReAct across all aspects of RCA -- predicting root causes, solutions, evidence, and responsibilities -- and tasks covered or uncovered by current rules, as validated by both automated metrics and human evaluations. Furthermore, RCAgent has already been integrated into the diagnosis and issue discovery workflow of the Real-time Compute Platform for Apache Flink of Alibaba Cloud.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. GSAR: Typed Grounding for Hallucination Detection and Recovery in Multi-Agent LLMs

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    GSAR is a grounding-evaluation framework for multi-agent LLMs that uses a four-way claim typology, evidence-weighted asymmetric scoring, and tiered recovery decisions to detect and mitigate hallucinations.

  2. Can LLMs Really Recover Microservice Failures? A Recovery-Aware Evaluation of Diagnosis-to-Action Reasoning

    cs.SE 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Even when RAG-based LLMs identify the right root-cause service 91–99% of the time, their recovery-action validity stays only 37–60% on a 302-incident Kubernetes benchmark.

  3. Argumentative Large Language Models for Explainable and Contestable Claim Verification

    cs.CL 2024-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    ArgLLMs build argumentation frameworks from LLMs to support explainable and contestable formal reasoning for claim verification.

  4. A Survey on the Memory Mechanism of Large Language Model based Agents

    cs.AI 2024-04 accept novelty 3.0

    A systematic review of memory designs, evaluation methods, applications, limitations, and future directions for LLM-based agents.