Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

The Data Provenance Initiative: A Large Scale Audit of Dataset Licensing & Attribution in AI

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.16787 v3 pith:6DLC3FX5 submitted 2023-10-25 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords datadatasetsauditdatasetlegallicenseprovenancetrace
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The race to train language models on vast, diverse, and inconsistently documented datasets has raised pressing concerns about the legal and ethical risks for practitioners. To remedy these practices threatening data transparency and understanding, we convene a multi-disciplinary effort between legal and machine learning experts to systematically audit and trace 1800+ text datasets. We develop tools and standards to trace the lineage of these datasets, from their source, creators, series of license conditions, properties, and subsequent use. Our landscape analysis highlights the sharp divides in composition and focus of commercially open vs closed datasets, with closed datasets monopolizing important categories: lower resource languages, more creative tasks, richer topic variety, newer and more synthetic training data. This points to a deepening divide in the types of data that are made available under different license conditions, and heightened implications for jurisdictional legal interpretations of copyright and fair use. We also observe frequent miscategorization of licenses on widely used dataset hosting sites, with license omission of 70%+ and error rates of 50%+. This points to a crisis in misattribution and informed use of the most popular datasets driving many recent breakthroughs. As a contribution to ongoing improvements in dataset transparency and responsible use, we release our entire audit, with an interactive UI, the Data Provenance Explorer, which allows practitioners to trace and filter on data provenance for the most popular open source finetuning data collections: www.dataprovenance.org.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Domain-Aware Scaling Laws Uncover Data Synergy

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Domain-aware scaling laws with fitted γ and σ synergy terms recover stable code-math interactions from observational LLM mixtures and correctly predict mixture rankings in controlled small-scale trainings.

  2. FlexOlmo: Open Language Models for Flexible Data Use

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    FlexOlmo merges independently trained language-model experts, trained on private data, into a single mixture-of-experts model without joint training.

  3. KatotohananQA: Evaluating Truthfulness of Large Language Models in Filipino

    cs.CL 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    KatotohananQA is a Filipino translation of TruthfulQA; seven LLMs scored 94.72% in English versus 83.87% in Filipino, with GPT-5 and GPT-5 mini showing the smallest gap.

  4. Red Teaming AI Policy: A Taxonomy of Avoision and the EU AI Act

    cs.CY 2025-06 accept novelty 5.0 of 10

    A taxonomy of avoision under the EU AI Act, with strategies to escape scope, exploit exemptions, and manipulate risk or operator categories.

Pith tools