Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Differentially Private Permutation Tests

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.19043 v3 pith:6JOZKV4M submitted 2023-10-29 math.ST cs.CRcs.LGstat.MEstat.MLstat.TH

classification math.STcs.CRcs.LGstat.MEstat.MLstat.TH
keywords privacyprivatetestsframeworkpowerconcernsdatadifferentially
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent years have witnessed growing concerns about the privacy of sensitive data. In response to these concerns, differential privacy has emerged as a rigorous framework for privacy protection, gaining widespread recognition in both academic and industrial circles. While substantial progress has been made in private data analysis, existing methods often suffer from impracticality or a significant loss of statistical efficiency. This paper aims to alleviate these concerns in the context of hypothesis testing by introducing differentially private permutation tests. The proposed framework extends classical non-private permutation tests to private settings, maintaining both finite-sample validity and differential privacy in a rigorous manner. The power of the proposed test depends on the choice of a test statistic, and we establish general conditions for consistency and non-asymptotic uniform power. To demonstrate the utility and practicality of our framework, we focus on reproducing kernel-based test statistics and introduce differentially private kernel tests for two-sample and independence testing: dpMMD and dpHSIC. The proposed kernel tests are straightforward to implement, applicable to various types of data, and attain minimax optimal power across different privacy regimes. Our empirical evaluations further highlight their competitive power under various synthetic and real-world scenarios, emphasizing their practical value. The code is publicly available to facilitate the implementation of our framework.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Differentially private scale testing via rank transformations and percentile modifications

    stat.ME 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    New differentially private rank-based tests for two-sample scale differences achieve controlled type I error and often beat generic private testing frameworks in power.

  2. Knockoffs Inference under Privacy Constraints

    stat.ME 2025-06 reject novelty 7.0 of 10

    A differentially private mirror-peeling knockoff algorithm is introduced, with claimed exact FDR control and asymptotic power preservation.

  3. Testing for large-dimensional covariance matrix under differential privacy

    stat.ME 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A privacy-preserving test based on Laplace-perturbed sample eigenvalues is asymptotically distribution-free and detects n^{-1/2} local alternatives to Sigma = I.

Pith tools