Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

CreoleVal: Multilingual Multitask Benchmarks for Creoles

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.19567 v3 pith:KLYNSXTP submitted 2023-10-30 cs.CL cs.AI

CreoleVal: Multilingual Multitask Benchmarks for Creoles

classification cs.CL cs.AI
keywords creolescreolevallanguagesbenchmarkbenchmarksdatasetslearningpotential
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Creoles represent an under-explored and marginalized group of languages, with few available resources for NLP research.While the genealogical ties between Creoles and a number of highly-resourced languages imply a significant potential for transfer learning, this potential is hampered due to this lack of annotated data. In this work we present CreoleVal, a collection of benchmark datasets spanning 8 different NLP tasks, covering up to 28 Creole languages; it is an aggregate of novel development datasets for reading comprehension, relation classification, and machine translation for Creoles, in addition to a practical gateway to a handful of preexisting benchmarks. For each benchmark, we conduct baseline experiments in a zero-shot setting in order to further ascertain the capabilities and limitations of transfer learning for Creoles. Ultimately, we see CreoleVal as an opportunity to empower research on Creoles in NLP and computational linguistics, and in general, a step towards more equitable language technology around the globe.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. How Good is Your Wikipedia? Auditing Data Quality for Low-resource and Multilingual NLP

    cs.CL 2024-11 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The study filters non-English Wikipedia, reveals quality problems, proposes a 4-level ranking, and shows filtered data matches or beats raw data in language modeling with largest gains for lower-quality editions.