Pith. sign in

REVIEW 7 cited by

Breaking Language Barriers in Multilingual Mathematical Reasoning: Insights and Observations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.20246 v5 pith:ETZGAYE6 submitted 2023-10-31 cs.CL cs.AI

Breaking Language Barriers in Multilingual Mathematical Reasoning: Insights and Observations

classification cs.CL cs.AI
keywords multilingualreasoningllmslanguagelanguagesmathmathematicalmodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Existing research predominantly focuses on developing powerful language learning models (LLMs) for mathematical reasoning within monolingual languages, with few explorations in preserving efficacy in a multilingual context. To bridge this gap, this paper pioneers exploring and training powerful Multilingual Math Reasoning (xMR) LLMs. Firstly, by utilizing translation, we construct the first multilingual math reasoning instruction dataset, MGSM8KInstruct, encompassing ten distinct languages, thus addressing the issue of training data scarcity in xMR tasks. Based on the collected dataset, we propose different training strategies to build powerful xMR LLMs, named MathOctopus, notably outperform conventional open-source LLMs and exhibit superiority over ChatGPT in few-shot scenarios. Notably, MathOctopus-13B reaches 47.6% accuracy which exceeds ChatGPT 46.3% on MGSM testset. Beyond remarkable results, we unearth several pivotal observations and insights from extensive experiments: (1) When extending the rejection sampling strategy to the multilingual context, it proves effective for model performances, albeit limited. (2) Employing parallel corpora for math Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) across multiple languages not only significantly enhances model performance multilingually but also elevates their monolingual performance. This indicates that crafting multilingual corpora can be regarded as a vital strategy for enhancing model performance in a specific language, especially in mathematical reasoning tasks. For instance, MathOctopus-7B improves its counterparts that trained on English from 42.2% to 50.8% on GSM8K testset. Codes are available at https://github.com/microsoft/MathOctopus.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 7 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. PRIMETIME : Limits of LLMs in Temporal Primitives

    cs.NE 2025-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    PRIMETIME generator reveals that LLM datetime parsing and arithmetic primitives are individually unreliable but fully learnable via fine-tuning, enabling frontier-level accuracy on event planning with small LoRA models.

  2. WeatherSyn: An Instruction Tuning MLLM For Weather Forecasting Report Generation

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    WeatherSyn is the first instruction-tuned MLLM for weather forecasting report generation, outperforming closed-source models on a new dataset of 31 US cities across 8 weather aspects.

  3. CURE-Med: Curriculum-Informed Reinforcement Learning for Multilingual Medical Reasoning

    cs.AI 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    CURE-MED pairs a new 13-language medical reasoning benchmark with curriculum RL to raise logical correctness to 70% and language consistency to 95% at 32B scale while outperforming baselines.

  4. Artificial Intelligence for Mathematical Reasoning: An Integrated Survey of Language Models, Neuro-symbolic Systems, and Verified Discovery

    cs.AI 2026-06 conditional novelty 5.0

    AI for mathematics is best described as a supervision ladder — final answers, programs, process rewards, proof-assistant kernels — culminating in verified-discovery workflows.

  5. The Periodic Table of LLM Reasoning: A Structured Survey of Reasoning Paradigms, Methods, and Failure Modes

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A literature survey that introduces a taxonomy for LLM reasoning paradigms, analyzes methodological trends, and synthesizes failure modes from over 300 papers.

  6. Artificial Intelligence for Mathematical Reasoning: An Integrated Survey of Language Models, Neuro-symbolic Systems, and Verified Discovery

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A four-axis survey unifies informal, formal, discovery-oriented, and training/inference techniques for AI mathematical reasoning, with benchmark and failure-mode critique.

  7. Artificial Intelligence for Mathematical Reasoning: An Integrated Survey of Language Models, Neuro-symbolic Systems, and Verified Discovery

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    An integrated survey organizing AI mathematical reasoning into informal, formal, discovery, and technique axes while cataloging benchmarks and assessing failure modes.