Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Are These the Same Apple? Comparing Images Based on Object Intrinsics

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.00750 v1 pith:HFT33TTZ submitted 2023-11-01 cs.CV cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CVcs.AIcs.LG
keywords objectsimilaritydifferentimageintrinsicsmethodsundervision
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

The human visual system can effortlessly recognize an object under different extrinsic factors such as lighting, object poses, and background, yet current computer vision systems often struggle with these variations. An important step to understanding and improving artificial vision systems is to measure image similarity purely based on intrinsic object properties that define object identity. This problem has been studied in the computer vision literature as re-identification, though mostly restricted to specific object categories such as people and cars. We propose to extend it to general object categories, exploring an image similarity metric based on object intrinsics. To benchmark such measurements, we collect the Common paired objects Under differenT Extrinsics (CUTE) dataset of $18,000$ images of $180$ objects under different extrinsic factors such as lighting, poses, and imaging conditions. While existing methods such as LPIPS and CLIP scores do not measure object intrinsics well, we find that combining deep features learned from contrastive self-supervised learning with foreground filtering is a simple yet effective approach to approximating the similarity. We conduct an extensive survey of pre-trained features and foreground extraction methods to arrive at a strong baseline that best measures intrinsic object-centric image similarity among current methods. Finally, we demonstrate that our approach can aid in downstream applications such as acting as an analog for human subjects and improving generalizable re-identification. Please see our project website at https://s-tian.github.io/projects/cute/ for visualizations of the data and demos of our metric.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. MMIG-Bench: Towards Comprehensive and Explainable Evaluation of Multi-Modal Image Generation Models

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MMIG-Bench is a unified benchmark of 4,850 prompts and 1,750 reference images with a three-level evaluation suite, including the VQA-based Aspect Matching Score that correlates with human ratings.

Pith tools