Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Black-Box Prompt Optimization: Aligning Large Language Models without Model Training

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.04155 v3 pith:S27DZC2F submitted 2023-11-07 cs.CL

Black-Box Prompt Optimization: Aligning Large Language Models without Model Training

classification cs.CL
keywords llmsmodelstrainingpromptadditionalalignedalignmentblack-box
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive success in various applications. However, these models are often not well aligned with human intents, which calls for additional treatments on them; that is, the alignment problem. To make LLMs better follow user instructions, existing alignment methods primarily focus on further training them. However, the extra training of LLMs is usually expensive in terms of GPU computing; even worse, some LLMs are not accessible for user-demanded training, such as GPTs. In this work, we take a different perspective -- Black-Box Prompt Optimization (BPO) -- to perform alignments. The idea is to optimize user prompts to suit LLMs' input understanding, so as to best realize users' intents without updating LLMs' parameters. BPO leverages human preferences to optimize prompts, thus making it superior to LLM (e.g., ChatGPT) as a prompt engineer. Moreover, BPO is model-agnostic, and the empirical results demonstrate that the BPO-aligned ChatGPT yields a 22% increase in the win rate against its original version and 10% for GPT-4. Notably, the BPO-aligned LLMs can outperform the same models aligned by PPO and DPO, and it also brings additional performance gains when combining BPO with PPO or DPO. Code and datasets are released at https://github.com/thu-coai/BPO.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. MAGA-Bench: Machine-Augment-Generated Text via Alignment Detection Benchmark

    cs.CL 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0

    Adding human-alignment augmentation (roleplaying, BPO, self-refine, RLDF) to machine-generated text both fools existing detectors and improves the generalization of detectors fine-tuned on it.

  2. Adapting Large VLMs with Iterative and Manual Instructions for Generative Low-light Enhancement

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    VLM-IMI adapts VLMs with iterative and manual instructions plus a learnable fusion module to guide diffusion-based generative low-light image enhancement, outperforming prior methods in perceptual quality.

  3. Supplement Generation Training for Enhancing Agentic Task Performance

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    SGT trains a lightweight model to generate task-specific supplemental text that improves performance of a larger frozen LLM on agentic tasks without modifying the large model.

  4. Green Prompting: Characterizing Prompt-driven Energy Costs of LLM Inference

    cs.CL 2025-03 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Empirical tests on three LLMs show prompt semantics and task keywords drive inference energy costs more than length, with varying patterns by task.