Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Introducing an Improved Information-Theoretic Measure of Predictive Uncertainty

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.08309 v1 pith:URZHCAYA submitted 2023-11-14 cs.LG stat.ML

Introducing an Improved Information-Theoretic Measure of Predictive Uncertainty

classification cs.LG stat.ML
keywords predictivemeasureuncertaintymodeldistributionintroducedcurrentlimitations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Applying a machine learning model for decision-making in the real world requires to distinguish what the model knows from what it does not. A critical factor in assessing the knowledge of a model is to quantify its predictive uncertainty. Predictive uncertainty is commonly measured by the entropy of the Bayesian model average (BMA) predictive distribution. Yet, the properness of this current measure of predictive uncertainty was recently questioned. We provide new insights regarding those limitations. Our analyses show that the current measure erroneously assumes that the BMA predictive distribution is equivalent to the predictive distribution of the true model that generated the dataset. Consequently, we introduce a theoretically grounded measure to overcome these limitations. We experimentally verify the benefits of our introduced measure of predictive uncertainty. We find that our introduced measure behaves more reasonably in controlled synthetic tasks. Moreover, our evaluations on ImageNet demonstrate that our introduced measure is advantageous in real-world applications utilizing predictive uncertainty.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Complementing Self-Consistency with Cross-Model Disagreement for Uncertainty Quantification

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Cross-model semantic disagreement adds an epistemic uncertainty term that improves total uncertainty estimation over self-consistency alone, helping flag confident errors in LLMs.

  2. SphUnc: Hyperspherical Uncertainty Decomposition and Causal Identification via Information Geometry

    cs.LG 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    SphUnc decomposes uncertainty via hyperspherical von Mises-Fisher latents and performs causal identification through structural models on those latents.

  3. Rethinking Uncertainty Estimation in LLMs: A Principled Single-Sequence Measure

    cs.LG 2024-12 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Negative log-likelihood of the greedy-decoded most likely sequence (G-NLL) is a principled single-sequence uncertainty measure for LLMs that achieves state-of-the-art results.