Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

The Transient Nature of Emergent In-Context Learning in Transformers

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.08360 v3 pith:OTZXA4AB submitted 2023-11-14 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CL

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CL
keywords transformersemergeslearningtrainingtransientdatafindin-context
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Transformer neural networks can exhibit a surprising capacity for in-context learning (ICL) despite not being explicitly trained for it. Prior work has provided a deeper understanding of how ICL emerges in transformers, e.g. through the lens of mechanistic interpretability, Bayesian inference, or by examining the distributional properties of training data. However, in each of these cases, ICL is treated largely as a persistent phenomenon; namely, once ICL emerges, it is assumed to persist asymptotically. Here, we show that the emergence of ICL during transformer training is, in fact, often transient. We train transformers on synthetic data designed so that both ICL and in-weights learning (IWL) strategies can lead to correct predictions. We find that ICL first emerges, then disappears and gives way to IWL, all while the training loss decreases, indicating an asymptotic preference for IWL. The transient nature of ICL is observed in transformers across a range of model sizes and datasets, raising the question of how much to "overtrain" transformers when seeking compact, cheaper-to-run models. We find that L2 regularization may offer a path to more persistent ICL that removes the need for early stopping based on ICL-style validation tasks. Finally, we present initial evidence that ICL transience may be caused by competition between ICL and IWL circuits.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Natural Ungrokking: Asymmetric Control of Which Rules Survive Pretraining

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    During pretraining, language models exhibit natural ungrokking where learned rules are forgotten based on their support frequency in the corpus, with asymmetric editability of rule survival.

  2. Why Multimodal In-Context Learning Lags Behind? Unveiling the Inner Mechanisms and Bottlenecks

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Multimodal ICL lags text-only ICL in few-shot settings due to weak cross-modal reasoning alignment and unreliable task mapping transfer, with an inference-stage method proposed to strengthen transfer.

  3. Relational reasoning and inductive bias in transformers and large language models

    cs.LG 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    In-weights learning induces linear embeddings enabling transitive inference in transformers, whereas in-context learning defaults to match-and-copy unless pre-trained on linear tasks or prompted with linear mental maps.

  4. Better & Faster Large Language Models via Multi-token Prediction

    cs.CL 2024-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Multi-token prediction training yields higher sample efficiency, better benchmark scores on code generation, and up to 3x faster inference than standard next-token prediction for LLMs.

Pith tools