REVIEW 17 cited by
SimpleSafetyTests: a Test Suite for Identifying Critical Safety Risks in Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
SimpleSafetyTests: a Test Suite for Identifying Critical Safety Risks in Large Language Models
read the original abstract
The past year has seen rapid acceleration in the development of large language models (LLMs). However, without proper steering and safeguards, LLMs will readily follow malicious instructions, provide unsafe advice, and generate toxic content. We introduce SimpleSafetyTests (SST) as a new test suite for rapidly and systematically identifying such critical safety risks. The test suite comprises 100 test prompts across five harm areas that LLMs, for the vast majority of applications, should refuse to comply with. We test 11 open-access and open-source LLMs and four closed-source LLMs, and find critical safety weaknesses. While some of the models do not give a single unsafe response, most give unsafe responses to more than 20% of the prompts, with over 50% unsafe responses in the extreme. Prepending a safety-emphasising system prompt substantially reduces the occurrence of unsafe responses, but does not completely stop them from happening. Trained annotators labelled every model response to SST (n = 3,000). We use these annotations to evaluate five AI safety filters (which assess whether a models' response is unsafe given a prompt) as a way of automatically evaluating models' performance on SST. The filters' performance varies considerably. There are also differences across the five harm areas, and on the unsafe versus safe responses. The widely-used Perspective API has 72% accuracy and a newly-created zero-shot prompt to OpenAI's GPT-4 performs best with 89% accuracy. Content Warning: This paper contains prompts and responses that relate to child abuse, suicide, self-harm and eating disorders, scams and fraud, illegal items, and physical harm.
Forward citations
Cited by 17 Pith papers
-
CATCH-ME if you RAG: a dataset of Contextually Annotated multi-Turn Counterspeech against Hate and Misinformation Exchanges
Presents a new expert-curated dataset of multi-turn counterspeech dialogues in five languages targeting hate against seven groups, with span annotations linking to verified external knowledge for RAG applications.
-
How Many Iterations to Jailbreak? Dynamic Budget Allocation for Multi-Turn LLM Evaluation
DAPRO provides the first dynamic, theoretically guaranteed way to allocate interaction budgets across test cases for bounding time-to-event in multi-turn LLM evaluations, achieving tighter coverage than static conform...
-
How Many Iterations to Jailbreak? Dynamic Budget Allocation for Multi-Turn LLM Evaluation
DAPRO dynamically allocates multi-turn LLM evaluation budget to produce valid, tighter lower bounds on iterations-to-event without the conditional-independence assumption of prior conformal survival methods.
-
Robust Harmful Features Under Jailbreak Attacks: Mechanistic Evidence from Attention Head Specialization in Large Language Models
Jailbreak attacks suppress Adversarially Compromised Heads in early layers but leave Safety-Aligned Heads robust in mid-layers, enabling competitive detection from persistent activations.
-
Beyond Safe Data: Pretraining-Stage Alignment with Regular Safety Reflection
Safety Reflection Pretraining adds regular safety reflections to pretraining data to integrate self-monitoring and reduce unsafe generalization from safe data in LLMs.
-
Efficient Safety Benchmarking via Item Response Theory
Item Response Theory enables adaptive and fixed-subset item selection that reduces safety benchmark costs by 80-99.9% while preserving high correlation with full rankings.
-
Assisted Counterspeech Writing at the Crossroads of Hate Speech and Misinformation
LLMs generate adequate counterspeech for co-occurring hate and misinformation in 40% of cases, with a mixed knowledge strategy from fact-checkers and NGOs proving most effective after expert revision.
-
Navigating the Sea of LLM Evaluation: Investigating Bias in Toxicity Benchmarks
Toxicity benchmarks for LLMs produce inconsistent results when task type, input domain, or model changes, revealing intrinsic evaluation biases.
-
GLiGuard: Schema-Conditioned Classification for LLM Safeguard
GLiGuard is a compact schema-conditioned bidirectional encoder that matches 7B-27B guard models on safety benchmarks while delivering up to 16x higher throughput and 17x lower latency.
-
Chain of Risk: Safety Failures in Large Reasoning Models and Mitigation via Adaptive Multi-Principle Steering
Reasoning traces in large reasoning models expose safety failures missed by final-answer checks, and adaptive multi-principle steering reduces unsafe content in both traces and answers while preserving task performance.
-
LLM Safety From Within: Detecting Harmful Content with Internal Representations
SIREN identifies safety neurons via linear probing on internal LLM layers and combines them with adaptive weighting to detect harm, outperforming prior guard models with 250x fewer parameters.
-
Predict, Don't React: Value-Based Safety Forecasting for LLM Streaming
Forecasting expected future harmfulness from prefixes via Monte Carlo rollouts yields stronger streaming LLM moderation than boundary detection, without exact onset labels.
-
Blind Refusal: Language Models Refuse to Help Users Evade Unjust, Absurd, and Illegitimate Rules
Language models refuse 75.4% of requests to evade defeated rules and do so even after recognizing reasons that undermine the rule's legitimacy.
-
WildGuard: Open One-Stop Moderation Tools for Safety Risks, Jailbreaks, and Refusals of LLMs
WildGuard is a new open moderation model and dataset for LLM safety that identifies harmful prompts, risky responses, and refusal rates, achieving SOTA open-source performance and sometimes exceeding GPT-4 while cutti...
-
Robust Harmful Features Under Jailbreak Attacks: Mechanistic Evidence from Attention Head Specialization in Large Language Models
Jailbreak attacks suppress Adversarially Compromised Heads in early layers but leave Safety-Aligned Heads active in mid-layers, producing robust harmful features usable for competitive training-free detection.
-
Guardian-as-an-Advisor: Advancing Next-Generation Guardian Models for Trustworthy LLMs
Guardian-as-an-Advisor prepends risk labels and explanations from a guardian model to queries, improving LLM safety compliance and reducing over-refusal while adding minimal compute overhead.
-
Opir: Efficient Multi-Task Safety Classification for Toxicity, Jailbreaks, Hate Speech, and Harmful Content
Opir introduces efficient multi-task encoder models trained on a 996-category safety taxonomy that match or exceed larger baselines on most safety benchmarks while using under 100M parameters for edge variants.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.