Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Tailoring with Targeted Precision: Edit-Based Agents for Open-Domain Procedure Customization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.09510 v3 pith:6QCR3CJD submitted 2023-11-16 cs.CL

Tailoring with Targeted Precision: Edit-Based Agents for Open-Domain Procedure Customization

classification cs.CL
keywords customizationprocedureagentsarchitecturesend-to-endgardenhow-toneed
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

How-to procedures, such as how to plant a garden, are now used by millions of users, but sometimes need customizing to meet a user's specific needs, e.g., planting a garden without pesticides. Our goal is to measure and improve an LLM's ability to perform such customization. Our approach is to test several simple multi-LLM-agent architectures for customization, as well as an end-to-end LLM, using a new evaluation set, called CustomPlans, of over 200 WikiHow procedures each with a customization need. We find that a simple architecture with two LLM agents used sequentially performs best, one that edits a generic how-to procedure and one that verifies its executability, significantly outperforming (10.5% absolute) an end-to-end prompted LLM. This suggests that LLMs can be configured reasonably effectively for procedure customization. This also suggests that multi-agent editing architectures may be worth exploring further for other customization applications (e.g. coding, creative writing) in the future.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. DoubleAgents: Human-Agent Alignment in a Socially Embedded Workflow

    cs.HC 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    DoubleAgents shows that a distributed-cognition design with coordination agent, dashboard, and policy module increases user comfort and reliance on AI agents for coordination tasks over time.