REVIEW 3 cited by
Challenges of Large Language Models for Mental Health Counseling
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Challenges of Large Language Models for Mental Health Counseling
read the original abstract
The global mental health crisis is looming with a rapid increase in mental disorders, limited resources, and the social stigma of seeking treatment. As the field of artificial intelligence (AI) has witnessed significant advancements in recent years, large language models (LLMs) capable of understanding and generating human-like text may be used in supporting or providing psychological counseling. However, the application of LLMs in the mental health domain raises concerns regarding the accuracy, effectiveness, and reliability of the information provided. This paper investigates the major challenges associated with the development of LLMs for psychological counseling, including model hallucination, interpretability, bias, privacy, and clinical effectiveness. We explore potential solutions to these challenges that are practical and applicable to the current paradigm of AI. From our experience in developing and deploying LLMs for mental health, AI holds a great promise for improving mental health care, if we can carefully navigate and overcome pitfalls of LLMs.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Love, Lies, and Language Models: Investigating AI's Role in Romance-Baiting Scams
LLM agents outperform humans in romance-baiting scams, eliciting greater trust and 46% compliance versus 18%, with 0% detection by safety filters and 87% of scam tasks automatable.
-
Between Help and Harm: An Evaluation of Mental Health Crisis Handling by LLMs
Creates a clinical crisis taxonomy and 2,252-example dataset then audits five LLMs, finding variable safety with notable failures on indirect signals and in self-harm categories.
-
Alignment Plausibility: A New Standard for Assuring AI in Healthcare
Alignment plausibility—evidence that an AI system's values, training, and oversight cohere with safe positive health outcomes—should be the regulatory analogue of biological plausibility for LLMs in healthcare.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.