Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Bias-Variance Trade-off in Physics-Informed Neural Networks with Randomized Smoothing for High-Dimensional PDEs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.15283 v1 pith:2M34OAKS submitted 2023-11-26 cs.LG cs.AIcs.NAmath.DSmath.NAstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.NAmath.DSmath.NAstat.ML
keywords rs-pinnversionbiasedhigh-dimensionalnonlinearityunbiasedbias-variancehybrid
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

While physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have been proven effective for low-dimensional partial differential equations (PDEs), the computational cost remains a hurdle in high-dimensional scenarios. This is particularly pronounced when computing high-order and high-dimensional derivatives in the physics-informed loss. Randomized Smoothing PINN (RS-PINN) introduces Gaussian noise for stochastic smoothing of the original neural net model, enabling Monte Carlo methods for derivative approximation, eliminating the need for costly auto-differentiation. Despite its computational efficiency in high dimensions, RS-PINN introduces biases in both loss and gradients, negatively impacting convergence, especially when coupled with stochastic gradient descent (SGD). We present a comprehensive analysis of biases in RS-PINN, attributing them to the nonlinearity of the Mean Squared Error (MSE) loss and the PDE nonlinearity. We propose tailored bias correction techniques based on the order of PDE nonlinearity. The unbiased RS-PINN allows for a detailed examination of its pros and cons compared to the biased version. Specifically, the biased version has a lower variance and runs faster than the unbiased version, but it is less accurate due to the bias. To optimize the bias-variance trade-off, we combine the two approaches in a hybrid method that balances the rapid convergence of the biased version with the high accuracy of the unbiased version. In addition, we present an enhanced implementation of RS-PINN. Extensive experiments on diverse high-dimensional PDEs, including Fokker-Planck, HJB, viscous Burgers', Allen-Cahn, and Sine-Gordon equations, illustrate the bias-variance trade-off and highlight the effectiveness of the hybrid RS-PINN. Empirical guidelines are provided for selecting biased, unbiased, or hybrid versions, depending on the dimensionality and nonlinearity of the specific PDE problem.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Stochastic Taylor Derivative Estimator: Efficient amortization for arbitrary differential operators

    cs.LG 2024-11 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    A randomized Taylor-mode jet pushforward that estimates arbitrary differential operator contractions without forming the full derivative tensor.

  2. ProPINN: Demystifying Propagation Failures in Physics-Informed Neural Networks

    cs.LG 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ProPINN attributes PINN propagation failure to low gradient correlation between nearby points and uses multi-scale differential perturbation to raise that correlation, yielding large error reductions on convection, re...

Pith tools