Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

ProPINN: Demystifying Propagation Failures in Physics-Informed Neural Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.00803 v2 pith:BTEN3LKR submitted 2025-02-02 cs.LG

ProPINN: Demystifying Propagation Failures in Physics-Informed Neural Networks

classification cs.LG
keywords failurepropagationpinnlosspinnspropinnarchitecturemodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have earned high expectations in solving partial differential equations (PDEs), but their optimization usually faces thorny challenges due to the unique derivative-dependent loss function. By analyzing the loss distribution, previous research observed the propagation failure phenomenon of PINNs, intuitively described as the correct supervision for model outputs cannot ''propagate'' from initial states or boundaries to the interior domain. Going beyond intuitive understanding, this paper provides a formal and in-depth study of propagation failure and its root cause. Based on a detailed comparison with classical finite element methods, we ascribe the failure to the conventional single-point-processing architecture of PINNs and further prove that propagation failure is essentially caused by the lower gradient correlation of PINN models on nearby collocation points. Compared to superficial loss maps, this new perspective provides a more precise quantitative criterion to identify where and why PINN fails. The theoretical finding also inspires us to present a new PINN architecture, named ProPINN, which can effectively unite the gradients of region points for better propagation. ProPINN can reliably resolve PINN failure modes and significantly surpass advanced Transformer-based models with 46% relative promotion.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Cosmo-SPINN: Fuzzy Dark Matter Simulations with Physics-Informed Generative Networks

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Physics-informed generative U-Nets evolve and super-resolve fuzzy dark matter fields under Schrödinger–Poisson constraints with far less supervised data than pure data-driven baselines.

  2. PINNs Failure Modes are Overfitting

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    PINN failure modes are overfitting to collocation points; regularization and double backpropagation over full residuals fix them, achieving SOTA with up to 23x fewer points on standard benchmarks.

  3. Neural Multiscale Decomposition for Solving The Nonlinear Klein-Gordon Equation with Time Oscillation

    math.NA 2025-11 reject novelty 5.0

    NeuralMD solves the oscillatory NKGE by training one network on the slow NLSW envelope and another on the remainder, but its model-selection step requires the exact solution as ground truth.