Towards complete characterization of topological insulators and superconductors: A systematic construction of topological invariants based on Atiyah-Hirzebruch spectral sequence
Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 06:21 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
Atiyah-Hirzebruch spectral sequence in momentum space yields topological invariants that fully characterize K-groups for time-reversal symmetric spinful superconductors in 159 space groups.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
Using the Atiyah-Hirzebruch spectral sequence in momentum space, the authors construct topological invariants for all space groups in the class of time-reversal symmetric spinful superconductors with conventional pairing. These invariants completely characterize the K-groups in 159 space groups. The same method applies to a large part of other symmetry classes, and gauge-fixed invariants for normal conducting phases can be converted to gauge-independent versions.
What carries the argument
Atiyah-Hirzebruch spectral sequence in momentum space, which filters successive approximations to produce explicit topological invariants for given symmetry classes.
If this is right
- The invariants diagnose topological phases in classes where symmetry indicators return trivial results.
- Validation across random Hamiltonians confirms the quantities function as topological invariants.
- The construction supplies a uniform method for a large fraction of symmetry classes instead of isolated examples.
- Gauge-independent forms derived from the gauge-fixed invariants enable direct numerical evaluation for normal conducting phases.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- Pairing the invariants with first-principles band calculations could systematically enlarge the catalog of candidate topological materials.
- The spectral-sequence procedure may extend without major change to other pairing symmetries or to insulators in the same symmetry classes.
- Direct comparison of the new invariants against known classifications in low-dimensional or high-symmetry space groups offers an immediate consistency check.
Load-bearing premise
The spectral sequence applied in momentum space together with the chosen gauge conditions produces quantities unchanged under symmetry-preserving continuous deformations of the Hamiltonian.
What would settle it
Compute the constructed invariants on a family of random symmetric Hamiltonians known to realize a nontrivial K-group element in one of the 159 space groups and verify that the invariant takes the expected nonzero value while remaining zero for topologically trivial cases.
Figures
read the original abstract
The past decade has witnessed significant progress in topological materials investigation. Symmetry-indicator theory and topological quantum chemistry provide an efficient scheme to diagnose topological phases from only partial information of wave functions without full knowledge of topological invariants, which has resulted in a recent comprehensive materials search. However, not all topological phases can be captured by this framework, and topological invariants are needed for a more refined diagnosis of topological phases. In this study, we present a systematic framework to construct topological invariants for a large part of symmetry classes, which should be contrasted with the existing invariants discovered through one-by-one approaches. Our method is based on the recently developed Atiyah-Hirzebruch spectral sequence in momentum space. As a demonstration, we construct topological invariants for time-reversal symmetric spinful superconductors with conventional pairing symmetries of all space groups, for which symmetry indicators are silent. We also validate that the obtained quantities work as topological invariants by computing them for randomly generated symmetric Hamiltonians. Remarkably, the constructed topological invariants completely characterize $K$-groups in 159 space groups. Our topological invariants for normal conducting phases are defined under some gauge conditions. To facilitate efficient numerical simulations, we discuss how to derive gauge-independent topological invariants from the gauge-fixed topological invariants through some examples. Combined with first-principles calculations, our results will help us discover topological materials that could be used in next-generation devices and pave the way for a more comprehensive topological materials database.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript develops a systematic method to construct topological invariants for a large class of symmetry-protected topological phases using the Atiyah-Hirzebruch spectral sequence applied in momentum space. As a key demonstration, it constructs such invariants for time-reversal symmetric spinful superconductors with conventional pairing symmetries across all space groups, where symmetry indicators do not apply. The invariants are validated through numerical computations on randomly generated symmetric Hamiltonians, and the authors claim that these invariants fully characterize the K-groups for 159 space groups. For normal conducting phases, gauge-fixed definitions are provided along with a method to obtain gauge-independent versions.
Significance. If the constructions hold, this provides a powerful general tool for diagnosing topological phases beyond current symmetry-indicator approaches, potentially enabling more complete searches for topological materials in databases and first-principles calculations. The explicit construction for superconductors in all space groups is a notable strength, as is the numerical validation approach.
major comments (2)
- [Abstract] The central claim that the constructed topological invariants completely characterize the K-groups in 159 space groups (abstract) is load-bearing; the manuscript should include an explicit comparison, such as a table matching the number and type of constructed invariants to the known rank and structure of each K-group, to substantiate completeness rather than asserting it from the spectral sequence application alone.
- [Demonstration and validation] The validation section states that the quantities work as invariants on random Hamiltonians, but lacks details on the ensemble (number of samples, parameter ranges, and exact procedure for enforcing symmetries in Hamiltonian generation), which is necessary to evaluate whether the numerical evidence robustly supports the claim of invariance and quantization for the full set of constructed invariants.
minor comments (3)
- The abstract refers to 'a large part of symmetry classes' without enumerating them beyond the TR-symmetric spinful superconductor case; a brief list or reference to the relevant Altland-Zirnbauer classes would improve clarity.
- The discussion of deriving gauge-independent invariants from gauge-fixed ones is illustrated through examples; a general algorithmic outline or pseudocode would aid readers in applying the method to other cases.
- Notation for the spectral sequence pages and the resulting invariants should be made consistent throughout to avoid ambiguity in the construction steps.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to improve clarity and substantiation of our claims.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [Abstract] The central claim that the constructed topological invariants completely characterize the K-groups in 159 space groups (abstract) is load-bearing; the manuscript should include an explicit comparison, such as a table matching the number and type of constructed invariants to the known rank and structure of each K-group, to substantiate completeness rather than asserting it from the spectral sequence application alone.
Authors: We agree that an explicit comparison would strengthen the presentation and allow readers to directly verify the completeness. While the Atiyah-Hirzebruch spectral sequence guarantees that our construction captures the full structure of the K-groups (including all generators and relations), we will add a supplementary table in the revised manuscript that lists, for each of the 159 space groups, the number and type of invariants we construct alongside the known rank and torsion structure of the corresponding K-group. This will make the completeness explicit rather than relying solely on the spectral sequence argument. revision: yes
-
Referee: [Demonstration and validation] The validation section states that the quantities work as invariants on random Hamiltonians, but lacks details on the ensemble (number of samples, parameter ranges, and exact procedure for enforcing symmetries in Hamiltonian generation), which is necessary to evaluate whether the numerical evidence robustly supports the claim of invariance and quantization for the full set of constructed invariants.
Authors: We acknowledge that the current description of the numerical ensemble is insufficient for full reproducibility and evaluation. In the revised manuscript we will expand the validation section to specify the total number of random Hamiltonians generated, the ranges and distributions of the random parameters, and the exact algorithmic procedure used to enforce the space-group symmetries (including how the pairing terms and time-reversal symmetry are imposed). These additions will allow readers to assess the robustness of the numerical evidence for invariance and quantization across all constructed invariants. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No significant circularity; derivation applies external spectral sequence
full rationale
The manuscript constructs topological invariants by direct application of the Atiyah-Hirzebruch spectral sequence in momentum space to the relevant symmetry classes and space groups. The central claim of completeness for K-groups in 159 space groups follows from the filtration and convergence properties of that spectral sequence, which is an established mathematical tool independent of the present paper. Validation consists of explicit construction plus numerical checks on randomly generated symmetric Hamiltonians; these checks corroborate invariance and quantization but are not used to define or fit the invariants themselves. No self-definitional reduction, fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or load-bearing self-citation chain appears in the derivation. The gauge-fixed definitions for normal phases are converted to gauge-independent forms by explicit procedures, again without circularity. The result is therefore self-contained against external mathematical benchmarks.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (1)
- domain assumption Atiyah-Hirzebruch spectral sequence applies in momentum space to classify topological phases for the symmetry classes considered
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Crystalline topological invariants in quantum many-body systems
Reviews characterization, classification, and detection of crystalline symmetry-protected topological invariants in 2D integer and fractional Chern insulators, focusing on translation, rotation, and charge conservation.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
(A3) In the following, “ ∼” denotes that we forget about the Z2-nature of an Abelian group
General framework The following commutative diagram shows the mathemati- cal structure behind our problem: 0 P p−1,−p 1 ˜Ep−1,−p 1 Ep−1,−p 1 0 0 P p,−p 1 ˜Ep,−p 1 Ep,−p 1 0 0 P p+1,−p 1 ˜Ep+1,−p 1 Ep+1,−p 1 0 i ˜dp−1,−p 1 ˜dp−1,−p 1 τ dp−1,−p 1 i ˜dp,−p 1 ˜dp,−p 1 τ dp,−p 1 i τ , where Ep,−p 1 := DpM i=1 Z2[b(p) i ] ⊕ NpM i=Dp+1 Z[b(p) i ]; (A1) ˜Ep,−p 1 ...
-
[2]
Example: spinless superconductors in P 31211′ As an example, we discuss time-reversal symmetric spin- less superconductors in space group P 3121 with the con- ventional pairing symmetry A1. This space is generated by threefold screw Sz = {C z 3 |(0, 0, 1/3)⊤}, twofold ro- tation C[100] 2 = {C x 2 |(0, 0, 2/3)⊤} along x-direction, and translations. Accordi...
-
[3]
= τ0σ0, (A32) U(C[100] 2 ) = τ0σz, (A33) where τi=0,x,y,z and σi=0,x,y,z are Pauli matrices acting on Nambu-spinor space and the eigenvalue space, respectively. This model corresponds to b4 + b5 and exhibits four gap- less points on( √3µ 2 , 0, 0), (0, √3µ 2 , 0), and (± √3µ 2 , ∓ √3µ 2 , 0), which are the 2-cell A-A ′-L′-L and its symmetry-related 2- cel...
-
[4]
Example: Pc3 The next example is spinless superconductors in magnetic space group Pc3 with the conventional pairing symmetry A. Generators of magnetic space are threefold rotation C z 3 , time- reversal with half translation along z-direction, and primi- tive translations. Although the Abelian group structure of K- group is unknown, we have information ab...
-
[5]
(0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, − 1 2 , 1 2) forming the same analysis, we have [X(1)]−1 = ∆1 ∆2 ∆3 P1 P2 P3 U1 E1 G1 0 −1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 −1 −1 −1 0 0 0 0 −1 0 1 1 −1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 −1 0 0 −1 −1 −2 0 0 0 0 −2 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 2 2 1 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 −1 1 1 ; (A36) Σ(0) = diag(1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2); (A...
-
[6]
Brief review of definitions of K-groups This subsection reviews definitions of K-groups in Refs. [47, 140]. Before defining K-groups, let us consider the triple (E, Hk, Href k ), where Hk and Href k are Hamiltoni- ans, and E is a vector bundle on which Hk and Href k act. In the presence of symmetries, symmetry representations Uk(g) are the same for Hk and...
-
[7]
(63) so that det qα k = Z[qα k]Dα for EAZ class AIII/CI and det qα k = Z[qα k]2Dα for EAZ class DIII
Choice of a basis for the computation of q-matrix In this subsection, we explain how to choose Uα± in Eq. (63) so that det qα k = Z[qα k]Dα for EAZ class AIII/CI and det qα k = Z[qα k]2Dα for EAZ class DIII. Let us recall that U α ± satisfies P α±U α ± = U α ±, (B7) where P α± is a projection matrix defined in Eq. (61). Fur- thermore, U α ± is transformed...
-
[8]
After computing Wl[Hk], Wg[Hk], C[Hk] in Eqs
Check of completeness of topological invariants Here, we explain how to confirm that our invariants span E1,−1 2 . After computing Wl[Hk], Wg[Hk], C[Hk] in Eqs. (97), (98), and (99) for the 20 Hamiltonians, we have L = Wl[H(1) k ], Wl[H(2) k ], · · · , Wl[H(20) k ] , (B22) F = Wg[H(1) k ], Wg[H(2) k ], · · · , Wg[H(20) k ] , (B23) T = C[H(1) k ], C[H(2) k...
-
[9]
give us the computed results of Z-valued invariants without gapless points on 2-cells. Then, we again consider the Smith normal form of (f′ r1+1, · · · , f′ 20) UF (f′ r1+1, · · · , f′ 20)VF = ΣF O . (B26) If rankΣF = Nf and [ΣF ]j = 1 for (j = 1 , · · · Nf), our Z-valued invariants can fully characterize ZNf . Last, we discuss Zk-valued invariants for ga...
-
[10]
Let us suppose that we have λi−r1 such that λi−r1 /∈ { 0, 1} for R0 + 1 ≤ i − r1 ≤ R0 + Nt (R0 ∈ Z)
is a set of results of Zk-valued invariants without gapless points on 2-cells, which is denoted by T. Let us suppose that we have λi−r1 such that λi−r1 /∈ { 0, 1} for R0 + 1 ≤ i − r1 ≤ R0 + Nt (R0 ∈ Z). Then, we define a diagonal matrix by A = diag (λR0+1, · · · , λR0+Nt) . (B27) We construct a basis set of T A from its Smith normal form UT T A VT = ΣT O ...
-
[11]
(C9) Here, M T is the transpose of matrix M
Transpose Given a homomorphism ϕg, we consider an invertible ma- trix M ∈ GLn(C) with the following transpose-type G- symmetry: M = ugM u† g, ϕ g = 1, ugM T u† g, ϕ g = −1, g ∈ G. (C9) Here, M T is the transpose of matrix M. In the basis where uρ g is given by (C8), the matrix M is block-diagonalized as M = M ˜α 1Dα ⊗ m˜α, (C10) m˜α ∈ GLnρ ˜α (C), A, AI, ...
-
[12]
Complex conjugation Depending on the homomorphism ϕg, we consider an in- vertible matrix M ∈ GLn(C) that possesses G-symmetry of complex conjugation type: M = ugM u† g, ϕ g = 1, ugM ∗u† g, ϕ g = −1, g ∈ G. (C26) Here, M ∗ denotes the complex conjugate of the matrix M. In the basis where uρ g is given by (C8), the matrix M is block- diagonalized as (C10) a...
-
[13]
C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele, Z2 Topological Order and the Quantum Spin Hall Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 146802 (2005)
work page 2005
-
[14]
C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele, Quantum Spin Hall Effect in Graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 226801 (2005)
work page 2005
-
[15]
B. A. Bernevig, T. L. Hughes, and S.-C. Zhang, Quan- tum spin hall effect and topological phase transition in hgte quantum wells, Science 314, 1757 (2006), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.1133734
- [16]
-
[17]
J. E. Moore and L. Balents, Topological invariants of time- reversal-invariant band structures, Phys. Rev. B 75, 121306 (2007)
work page 2007
-
[18]
L. Fu, C. L. Kane, and E. J. Mele, Topological insulators in 56 three dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 106803 (2007)
work page 2007
- [19]
-
[20]
M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Colloquium: Topological insu- lators, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045 (2010)
work page 2010
- [21]
-
[22]
X.-L. Qi, T. L. Hughes, S. Raghu, and S.-C. Zhang, Time- Reversal-Invariant Topological Superconductors and Super- fluids in Two and Three Dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 187001 (2009)
work page 2009
-
[23]
Sato, Topological odd-parity superconductors, Phys
M. Sato, Topological odd-parity superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 81, 220504(R) (2010)
work page 2010
- [24]
-
[25]
X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Topological insulators and super- conductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057 (2011)
work page 2011
-
[26]
M. Sato and Y . Ando, Topological superconductors: a review, Reports on Progress in Physics 80, 076501 (2017)
work page 2017
-
[27]
A. M. Essin, J. E. Moore, and D. Vanderbilt, Magnetoelectric polarizability and axion electrodynamics in crystalline insula- tors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 146805 (2009)
work page 2009
-
[28]
A. M. Essin, A. M. Turner, J. E. Moore, and D. Vanderbilt, Or- bital magnetoelectric coupling in band insulators, Phys. Rev. B 81, 205104 (2010)
work page 2010
-
[29]
P. Hosur, Circular photogalvanic effect on topological insula- tor surfaces: Berry-curvature-dependent response, Phys. Rev. B 83, 035309 (2011)
work page 2011
-
[30]
A. M. Turner, Y . Zhang, R. S. K. Mong, and A. Vishwanath, Quantized response and topology of magnetic insulators with inversion symmetry, Phys. Rev. B85, 165120 (2012)
work page 2012
-
[31]
T. Morimoto and N. Nagaosa, Topological nature of nonlin- ear optical effects in solids, Science Advances 2, e1501524 (2016)
work page 2016
-
[32]
F. de Juan, A. G. Grushin, T. Morimoto, and J. E. Moore, Quantized circular photogalvanic effect in weyl semimetals, Nature Communications 8, 15995 (2017)
work page 2017
-
[33]
S. Kobayashi, A. Yamakage, Y . Tanaka, and M. Sato, Ma- jorana Multipole Response of Topological Superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 097002 (2019)
work page 2019
-
[34]
L. Trifunovic, S. Ono, and H. Watanabe, Geometric or- bital magnetization in adiabatic processes, Phys. Rev. B 100, 054408 (2019)
work page 2019
-
[35]
J. J. He, Y . Tanaka, and N. Nagaosa, Optical Responses of Chiral Majorana Edge States in Two-Dimensional Topological Superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 237002 (2021)
work page 2021
- [36]
-
[37]
H. Watanabe and Y . Yanase, Chiral Photocurrent in Parity- Violating Magnet and Enhanced Response in Topological An- tiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. X 11, 011001 (2021)
work page 2021
- [38]
- [39]
-
[40]
S. Nakatsuji and R. Arita, Topological Magnets: Functions Based on Berry Phase and Multipoles, Annual Review of Con- densed Matter Physics 13, 119 (2022)
work page 2022
-
[41]
B. A. Bernevig, C. Felser, and H. Beidenkopf, Progress and prospects in magnetic topological materials, Nature 603, 41 (2022)
work page 2022
-
[42]
C.-K. Chiu, H. Yao, and S. Ryu, Classification of topological insulators and superconductors in the presence of reflection symmetry, Phys. Rev. B 88, 075142 (2013)
work page 2013
-
[43]
T. Morimoto and A. Furusaki, Topological classification with additional symmetries from Clifford algebras, Phys. Rev. B 88, 125129 (2013)
work page 2013
-
[44]
K. Shiozaki and M. Sato, Topology of crystalline insulators and superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 90, 165114 (2014)
work page 2014
-
[45]
K. Shiozaki, M. Sato, and K. Gomi, Topology of nonsymmor- phic crystalline insulators and superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 93, 195413 (2016)
work page 2016
-
[46]
R. Thorngren and D. V . Else, Gauging Spatial Symmetries and the Classification of Topological Crystalline Phases, Phys. Rev. X 8, 011040 (2018)
work page 2018
-
[47]
E. Cornfeld and A. Chapman, Classification of crystalline topological insulators and superconductors with point group symmetries, Phys. Rev. B 99, 075105 (2019)
work page 2019
-
[48]
K. Shiozaki, The classification of surface states of topologi- cal insulators and superconductors with magnetic point group symmetry, Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics 2022 (2022), 04A104
work page 2022
-
[49]
E. Cornfeld and S. Carmeli, Tenfold topology of crystals: Uni- fied classification of crystalline topological insulators and su- perconductors, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 013052 (2021)
work page 2021
-
[50]
A. P. Schnyder, S. Ryu, A. Furusaki, and A. W. W. Ludwig, Classification of topological insulators and superconductors in three spatial dimensions, Phys. Rev. B 78, 195125 (2008)
work page 2008
-
[51]
A. Kitaev, Periodic table for topological insulators and super- conductors, AIP Conference Proceedings 1134, 22 (2009)
work page 2009
-
[52]
S. Ryu, A. P. Schnyder, A. Furusaki, and A. W. W. Ludwig, Topological insulators and superconductors: tenfold way and dimensional hierarchy, New Journal of Physics 12, 065010 (2010)
work page 2010
-
[53]
Fu, Topological crystalline insulators, Phys
L. Fu, Topological crystalline insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 106802 (2011)
work page 2011
-
[54]
J. C. Y . Teo, L. Fu, and C. L. Kane, Surface states and topo- logical invariants in three-dimensional topological insulators: Application to Bi1−xSbx, Phys. Rev. B 78, 045426 (2008)
work page 2008
- [55]
-
[56]
T. H. Hsieh, H. Lin, J. Liu, W. Duan, A. Bansil, and L. Fu, Topological crystalline insulators in the snte material class, Nature Communications 3, 982 (2012)
work page 2012
- [57]
-
[58]
Z. Wang, A. Alexandradinata, R. J. Cava, and B. A. Bernevig, Hourglass fermions, Nature 532, 189 (2016)
work page 2016
-
[59]
K. Shiozaki, M. Sato, and K. Gomi, Topological crystalline materials: General formulation, module structure, and wallpa- per groups, Phys. Rev. B 95, 235425 (2017)
work page 2017
-
[60]
W. A. Benalcazar, B. A. Bernevig, and T. L. Hughes, Quan- tized electric multipole insulators, Science 357, 61 (2017)
work page 2017
-
[61]
J. Langbehn, Y . Peng, L. Trifunovic, F. von Oppen, and P. W. Brouwer, Reflection-Symmetric Second-Order Topo- logical Insulators and Superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 246401 (2017)
work page 2017
-
[62]
W. A. Benalcazar, B. A. Bernevig, and T. L. Hughes, Electric multipole moments, topological multipole moment pumping, 57 and chiral hinge states in crystalline insulators, Phys. Rev. B 96, 245115 (2017)
work page 2017
-
[63]
Z. Song, Z. Fang, and C. Fang, (d − 2)-Dimensional Edge States of Rotation Symmetry Protected Topological States, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 246402 (2017)
work page 2017
-
[64]
F. Schindler, Z. Wang, M. G. Vergniory, A. M. Cook, A. Mu- rani, S. Sengupta, A. Y . Kasumov, R. Deblock, S. Jeon, I. Drozdov, H. Bouchiat, S. Gu ´eron, A. Yazdani, B. A. Bernevig, and T. Neupert, Higher-order topology in bismuth, Nature Physics 14, 918 (2018)
work page 2018
-
[65]
F. Schindler, A. M. Cook, M. G. Vergniory, Z. Wang, S. S. P. Parkin, B. A. Bernevig, and T. Neupert, Higher-order topolog- ical insulators, Science Advances 4, aat0346 (2018)
work page 2018
- [66]
-
[67]
E. Khalaf, Higher-order topological insulators and supercon- ductors protected by inversion symmetry, Phys. Rev. B 97, 205136 (2018)
work page 2018
-
[68]
L. Trifunovic and P. W. Brouwer, Higher-Order Bulk- Boundary Correspondence for Topological Crystalline Phases, Phys. Rev. X 9, 011012 (2019)
work page 2019
-
[69]
C. Fang and L. Fu, New classes of topological crystalline in- sulators having surface rotation anomaly, Science Advances5, eaat2374 (2019)
work page 2019
-
[70]
J. Ahn and B.-J. Yang, Unconventional majorana fermions on the surface of topological superconductors protected by rota- tional symmetry, Phys. Rev. B103, 184502 (2021)
work page 2021
-
[71]
R. Noguchi, M. Kobayashi, Z. Jiang, K. Kuroda, T. Takahashi, Z. Xu, D. Lee, M. Hirayama, M. Ochi, T. Shirasawa, P. Zhang, C. Lin, C. Bareille, S. Sakuragi, H. Tanaka, S. Kunisada, K. Kurokawa, K. Yaji, A. Harasawa, V . Kandyba, A. Giampi- etri, A. Barinov, T. K. Kim, C. Cacho, M. Hashimoto, D. Lu, S. Shin, R. Arita, K. Lai, T. Sasagawa, and T. Kondo, Evid...
work page 2021
- [72]
-
[73]
H. Song, S.-J. Huang, L. Fu, and M. Hermele, Topological Phases Protected by Point Group Symmetry, Phys. Rev. X 7, 011020 (2017)
work page 2017
-
[74]
C. Z. Xiong, Minimalist approach to the classification of sym- metry protected topological phases, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 51, 445001 (2018)
work page 2018
-
[75]
Z. Song, S.-J. Huang, Y . Qi, C. Fang, and M. Hermele, Topo- logical states from topological crystals, Science Advances 5, eaax2007 (2019)
work page 2019
-
[76]
Z. Song, C. Fang, and Y . Qi, Real-space recipes for gen- eral topological crystalline states, Nature Communications11, 4197 (2020)
work page 2020
-
[77]
K. Shiozaki, C. Z. Xiong, and K. Gomi, Generalized homol- ogy and Atiyah–Hirzebruch spectral sequence in crystalline symmetry protected topological phenomena, Progress of The- oretical and Experimental Physics 2023, 083I01 (2023)
work page 2023
-
[78]
D. V . Else and R. Thorngren, Crystalline topological phases as defect networks, Phys. Rev. B 99, 115116 (2019)
work page 2019
-
[79]
H. Song, C. Z. Xiong, and S.-J. Huang, Bosonic crystalline symmetry protected topological phases beyond the group co- homology proposal, Phys. Rev. B 101, 165129 (2020)
work page 2020
-
[81]
B. Peng, H. Weng, and C. Fang, Wire construction of class diii topological crystalline superconductors in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. B 106, 174512 (2022)
work page 2022
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.