Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Mitigating Hallucination in Visual Language Models with Visual Supervision

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.16479 v1 pith:ETPXKQOG submitted 2023-11-27 cs.CV

Mitigating Hallucination in Visual Language Models with Visual Supervision

classification cs.CV
keywords hallucinationdetailedimagelvlmsmodelsvisiongenerateloss
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large vision-language models (LVLMs) suffer from hallucination a lot, generating responses that apparently contradict to the image content occasionally. The key problem lies in its weak ability to comprehend detailed content in a multi-modal context, which can be mainly attributed to two factors in training data and loss function. The vision instruction dataset primarily focuses on global description, and the auto-regressive loss function favors text modeling rather than image understanding. In this paper, we bring more detailed vision annotations and more discriminative vision models to facilitate the training of LVLMs, so that they can generate more precise responses without encounter hallucination. On one hand, we generate image-text pairs with detailed relationship annotations in panoptic scene graph dataset (PSG). These conversations pay more attention on detailed facts in the image, encouraging the model to answer questions based on multi-modal contexts. On the other hand, we integrate SAM and mask prediction loss as auxiliary supervision, forcing the LVLMs to have the capacity to identify context-related objects, so that they can generate more accurate responses, mitigating hallucination. Moreover, to provide a deeper evaluation on the hallucination in LVLMs, we propose a new benchmark, RAH-Bench. It divides vision hallucination into three different types that contradicts the image with wrong categories, attributes or relations, and introduces False Positive Rate as detailed sub-metric for each type. In this benchmark, our approach demonstrates an +8.4% enhancement compared to original LLaVA and achieves widespread performance improvements across other models.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. MM-Snowball: Evaluating and Mitigating Hallucination Snowballing in Multimodal Multi-Turn Dialogue

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    MM-Snowball benchmark diagnoses hallucination snowballing in multi-turn MLLM dialogues; CAVR mitigates it via dual visual rectification at representation and logit levels.

  2. DV-SFT: Direct Vision Supervision for Fine-Grained Visual Understanding

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    DV-SFT introduces direct vision supervision for visual tokens in MLLMs by auto-labeling from OCR correspondences, outperforming standard SFT on three in-domain and four out-of-domain benchmarks.

  3. See Only When Needed: Context-Aware Attention Intervention for Mitigating Hallucinations in LVLMs

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    CAI is a training-free inference-time attention intervention that uses two-axis selectivity (where to look and when to intervene) via entropy- and depth-gating to mitigate hallucinations in LVLMs while preserving fluency.

  4. Hallucination of Multimodal Large Language Models: A Survey

    cs.CV 2024-04 accept novelty 5.0

    The survey organizes causes of hallucinations in MLLMs, reviews evaluation benchmarks and metrics, and outlines mitigation approaches plus open questions.