REVIEW 2 cited by
VITATECS: A Diagnostic Dataset for Temporal Concept Understanding of Video-Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The ability to perceive how objects change over time is a crucial ingredient in human intelligence. However, current benchmarks cannot faithfully reflect the temporal understanding abilities of video-language models (VidLMs) due to the existence of static visual shortcuts. To remedy this issue, we present VITATECS, a diagnostic VIdeo-Text dAtaset for the evaluation of TEmporal Concept underStanding. Specifically, we first introduce a fine-grained taxonomy of temporal concepts in natural language in order to diagnose the capability of VidLMs to comprehend different temporal aspects. Furthermore, to disentangle the correlation between static and temporal information, we generate counterfactual video descriptions that differ from the original one only in the specified temporal aspect. We employ a semi-automatic data collection framework using large language models and human-in-the-loop annotation to obtain high-quality counterfactual descriptions efficiently. Evaluation of representative video-language understanding models confirms their deficiency in temporal understanding, revealing the need for greater emphasis on the temporal elements in video-language research.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
RTime-QA: A Benchmark for Atomic Temporal Event Understanding in Large Multi-modal Models
RTime-QA is a video-question benchmark where models choose between temporally opposite descriptions of the same event, and current AI models score far below humans.
-
TimeCausality: Evaluating the Causal Ability in Time Dimension for Vision Language Models
Introduces a 700-pair benchmark for temporal causal reasoning in VLMs, revealing large open-source vs. closed-source gaps and strong position bias.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.