Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Know Your Audience: Do LLMs Adapt to Different Age and Education Levels?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2312.02065 v1 pith:XC5KZ5ZF submitted 2023-12-04 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords llmsdifferenteducationreadabilityadaptanswersaudienceslevels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) offer a range of new possibilities, including adapting the text to different audiences and their reading needs. But how well do they adapt? We evaluate the readability of answers generated by four state-of-the-art LLMs (commercial and open-source) to science questions when prompted to target different age groups and education levels. To assess the adaptability of LLMs to diverse audiences, we compare the readability scores of the generated responses against the recommended comprehension level of each age and education group. We find large variations in the readability of the answers by different LLMs. Our results suggest LLM answers need to be better adapted to the intended audience demographics to be more comprehensible. They underline the importance of enhancing the adaptability of LLMs in education settings to cater to diverse age and education levels. Overall, current LLMs have set readability ranges and do not adapt well to different audiences, even when prompted. That limits their potential for educational purposes.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Can LLM Code Explanations Adapt to Diverse Problem-Solvers' Needs?

    cs.SE 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLMs measurably vary code-explanation wording when prompted with different problem-solving styles, yielding a 13-category taxonomy and a model ranking.

Pith tools