Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Low-Precision Mixed-Computation Models for Inference on Edge

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2312.02210 v1 pith:WSRJU4NS submitted 2023-12-03 cs.LG cs.AI

Low-Precision Mixed-Computation Models for Inference on Edge

classification cs.LG cs.AI
keywords fixpmixed-computationpositlow-precisionweightsapproachedgeenergy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper presents a mixed-computation neural network processing approach for edge applications that incorporates low-precision (low-width) Posit and low-precision fixed point (FixP) number systems. This mixed-computation approach employs 4-bit Posit (Posit4), which has higher precision around zero, for representing weights with high sensitivity, while it uses 4-bit FixP (FixP4) for representing other weights. A heuristic for analyzing the importance and the quantization error of the weights is presented to assign the proper number system to different weights. Additionally, a gradient approximation for Posit representation is introduced to improve the quality of weight updates in the backpropagation process. Due to the high energy consumption of the fully Posit-based computations, neural network operations are carried out in FixP or Posit/FixP. An efficient hardware implementation of a MAC operation with a first Posit operand and FixP for a second operand and accumulator is presented. The efficacy of the proposed low-precision mixed-computation approach is extensively assessed on vision and language models. The results show that, on average, the accuracy of the mixed-computation is about 1.5% higher than that of FixP with a cost of 0.19% energy overhead.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.