Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Data is Overrated: Perceptual Metrics Can Lead Learning in the Absence of Training Data

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2312.03455 v1 pith:UQ7L2PEC submitted 2023-12-06 cs.SD cs.AIcs.CVcs.LGeess.ASeess.IV

classification cs.SDcs.AIcs.CVcs.LGeess.ASeess.IV
keywords perceptualnaturaltrainingaudiodatametricsmodelssignals
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Perceptual metrics are traditionally used to evaluate the quality of natural signals, such as images and audio. They are designed to mimic the perceptual behaviour of human observers and usually reflect structures found in natural signals. This motivates their use as loss functions for training generative models such that models will learn to capture the structure held in the metric. We take this idea to the extreme in the audio domain by training a compressive autoencoder to reconstruct uniform noise, in lieu of natural data. We show that training with perceptual losses improves the reconstruction of spectrograms and re-synthesized audio at test time over models trained with a standard Euclidean loss. This demonstrates better generalisation to unseen natural signals when using perceptual metrics.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools