Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Extracting Self-Consistent Causal Insights from Users Feedback with LLMs and In-context Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2312.06820 v1 pith:ZMIKNFF6 submitted 2023-12-11 cs.AI cs.CLcs.LGstat.ME

classification cs.AIcs.CLcs.LGstat.ME
keywords feedbackissuesuserscausaldomainknowledgelearningllms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Microsoft Windows Feedback Hub is designed to receive customer feedback on a wide variety of subjects including critical topics such as power and battery. Feedback is one of the most effective ways to have a grasp of users' experience with Windows and its ecosystem. However, the sheer volume of feedback received by Feedback Hub makes it immensely challenging to diagnose the actual cause of reported issues. To better understand and triage issues, we leverage Double Machine Learning (DML) to associate users' feedback with telemetry signals. One of the main challenges we face in the DML pipeline is the necessity of domain knowledge for model design (e.g., causal graph), which sometimes is either not available or hard to obtain. In this work, we take advantage of reasoning capabilities in Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate a prior model that which to some extent compensates for the lack of domain knowledge and could be used as a heuristic for measuring feedback informativeness. Our LLM-based approach is able to extract previously known issues, uncover new bugs, and identify sequences of events that lead to a bug, while minimizing out-of-domain outputs.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Mitigating Hidden Confounding by Progressive Confounder Imputation via Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-06 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    ProCI uses LLMs to iteratively generate and impute hidden confounders, then validates them with a conditional independence test to improve treatment effect estimation.

Pith tools