Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Defenses in Adversarial Machine Learning: A Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2312.08890 v1 pith:DB776DXZ submitted 2023-12-13 cs.CV cs.CRcs.LG

classification cs.CVcs.CRcs.LG
keywords defenseparadigmsadversarialattackattacksbeenlearningmachine
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Adversarial phenomenon has been widely observed in machine learning (ML) systems, especially in those using deep neural networks, describing that ML systems may produce inconsistent and incomprehensible predictions with humans at some particular cases. This phenomenon poses a serious security threat to the practical application of ML systems, and several advanced attack paradigms have been developed to explore it, mainly including backdoor attacks, weight attacks, and adversarial examples. For each individual attack paradigm, various defense paradigms have been developed to improve the model robustness against the corresponding attack paradigm. However, due to the independence and diversity of these defense paradigms, it is difficult to examine the overall robustness of an ML system against different kinds of attacks.This survey aims to build a systematic review of all existing defense paradigms from a unified perspective. Specifically, from the life-cycle perspective, we factorize a complete machine learning system into five stages, including pre-training, training, post-training, deployment, and inference stages, respectively. Then, we present a clear taxonomy to categorize and review representative defense methods at each individual stage. The unified perspective and presented taxonomies not only facilitate the analysis of the mechanism of each defense paradigm but also help us to understand connections and differences among different defense paradigms, which may inspire future research to develop more advanced, comprehensive defenses.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Gradient Norm-based Fine-Tuning for Backdoor Defense in Automatic Speech Recognition

    cs.SD 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A gradient-norm-regularized fine-tuning method, GN-FT, removes backdoor behaviors from audio speech recognition models while keeping clean accuracy high.

Pith tools