Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Weaving Pathways for Justice with GPT: LLM-driven automated drafting of interactive legal applications

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2312.09198 v1 pith:6M2VMBTE submitted 2023-12-14 cs.AI cs.CVcs.CYcs.HCcs.SI

Quinten Steenhuis , David Colarusso , Bryce Willey This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.AIcs.CVcs.CYcs.HCcs.SI
keywords approachauthoringautomatedconstraineddraftinggenerativehelphuman
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Can generative AI help us speed up the authoring of tools to help self-represented litigants? In this paper, we describe 3 approaches to automating the completion of court forms: a generative AI approach that uses GPT-3 to iteratively prompt the user to answer questions, a constrained template-driven approach that uses GPT-4-turbo to generate a draft of questions that are subject to human review, and a hybrid method. We use the open source Docassemble platform in all 3 experiments, together with a tool created at Suffolk University Law School called the Assembly Line Weaver. We conclude that the hybrid model of constrained automated drafting with human review is best suited to the task of authoring guided interviews.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Analyzing Images of Legal Documents: Toward Multi-Modal LLMs for Access to Justice

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A pilot study finds GPT-4o extracts 73% of fields from photos of a lease form, with accuracy dropping from 98% on typed copies to 60% on low-quality handwritten photos.

Pith tools