Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

LiDAR-LLM: Exploring the Potential of Large Language Models for 3D LiDAR Understanding

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2312.14074 v1 pith:LLBM46CV submitted 2023-12-21 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords lidar-llmlanguagemodelsdatalargelidaroutdoorscenes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) and Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have shown promise in instruction following and 2D image understanding. While these models are powerful, they have not yet been developed to comprehend the more challenging 3D physical scenes, especially when it comes to the sparse outdoor LiDAR data. In this paper, we introduce LiDAR-LLM, which takes raw LiDAR data as input and harnesses the remarkable reasoning capabilities of LLMs to gain a comprehensive understanding of outdoor 3D scenes. The central insight of our LiDAR-LLM is the reformulation of 3D outdoor scene cognition as a language modeling problem, encompassing tasks such as 3D captioning, 3D grounding, 3D question answering, etc. Specifically, due to the scarcity of 3D LiDAR-text pairing data, we introduce a three-stage training strategy and generate relevant datasets, progressively aligning the 3D modality with the language embedding space of LLM. Furthermore, we design a View-Aware Transformer (VAT) to connect the 3D encoder with the LLM, which effectively bridges the modality gap and enhances the LLM's spatial orientation comprehension of visual features. Our experiments show that LiDAR-LLM possesses favorable capabilities to comprehend various instructions regarding 3D scenes and engage in complex spatial reasoning. LiDAR-LLM attains a 40.9 BLEU-1 on the 3D captioning task and achieves a 63.1\% classification accuracy and a 14.3\% BEV mIoU on the 3D grounding task. Web page: https://sites.google.com/view/lidar-llm

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. VisionThink: Smart and Efficient Vision Language Model via Reinforcement Learning

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A vision-language model learns via reinforcement learning when to upscale a low-resolution image, cutting visual tokens roughly in half while preserving accuracy on most benchmarks.

  2. City-VLM: Towards Multidomain Perception Scene Understanding via Multimodal Incomplete Learning

    cs.CV 2025-07 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new outdoor multiview multimodal QA dataset and a VAE-fused LVLM are presented with claims of large gains over prior models, but the evaluation is clouded by likely train-test source overlap and an undefined average.

  3. CheckManual: A New Challenge and Benchmark for Manual-based Appliance Manipulation

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A first benchmark that tests whether robots can read multi-page appliance manuals and then plan and execute manipulation tasks on appliances in simulation.

  4. Enhancing Reliability in LLM-Integrated Robotic Systems: A Unified Approach to Security and Safety

    cs.RO 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A unified framework of secure prompting, state memory, and rule-based safety validation improves LLM-driven robot navigation under prompt injection attacks and obstacle-heavy environments, with modest real-robot verification.

  5. LightVLM: Acceleraing Large Multimodal Models with Pyramid Token Merging and KV Cache Compression

    cs.CV 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    LightVLM accelerates vision-language model inference with pyramid token merging and KV cache compression, preserving about 98% accuracy with only 3% of image tokens.

Pith tools