Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

More than Correlation: Do Large Language Models Learn Causal Representations of Space?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2312.16257 v1 pith:PM2KCHOP submitted 2023-12-26 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords representationsllmsmodelspacegeospatialinternalspatialcausal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent work found high mutual information between the learned representations of large language models (LLMs) and the geospatial property of its input, hinting an emergent internal model of space. However, whether this internal space model has any causal effects on the LLMs' behaviors was not answered by that work, led to criticism of these findings as mere statistical correlation. Our study focused on uncovering the causality of the spatial representations in LLMs. In particular, we discovered the potential spatial representations in DeBERTa, GPT-Neo using representational similarity analysis and linear and non-linear probing. Our casual intervention experiments showed that the spatial representations influenced the model's performance on next word prediction and a downstream task that relies on geospatial information. Our experiments suggested that the LLMs learn and use an internal model of space in solving geospatial related tasks.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. On Entity Identification in Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Five language models cluster mentions of the same entity and separate mentions of different entities with AUC 0.66-0.9, with entity identity most cleanly encoded in a low-dimensional linear subspace of early layers.

Pith tools