Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Forecasts on Interacting Dark Energy from 21-cm Angular Power Spectrum with BINGO and SKA observations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2103.01796 v2 pith:23CFLAMG submitted 2021-03-02 astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-ph

classification astro-ph.COgr-qchep-ph
keywords bandlambdaska1-midbingoconstraintsdarkenergyintensity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Neutral hydrogen (HI) intensity mapping is a promising technique to probe the large-scale structure of the Universe, improving our understanding on the late-time accelerated expansion. In this work, we first scrutinize how an alternative cosmology, interacting dark energy (IDE), can affect the 21-cm angular power spectrum relative to the concordance $\Lambda$CDM model. We re-derive the 21-cm brightness temperature fluctuation in the context of such interaction and uncover an extra new contribution. Then we estimate the noise level of three upcoming HI intensity mapping surveys, BINGO, SKA1-MID Band$\,$1 and Band$\,$2, respectively, and employ a Fisher matrix approach to forecast their constraints on the IDE model. We find that while $\textit{Planck}\,$ 2018 maintains its dominion over early-Universe parameter constraints, BINGO and SKA1-MID Band$\,$2 put complementary bounding to the latest CMB measurements on dark energy equation of state $w$, the interacting strength $\lambda_i$ and the reduced Hubble constant $h$, and SKA1-MID Band$\,$1 even outperforms $\textit{Planck}\,$ 2018 in these late-Universe parameter constraints. The expected minimum uncertainties are given by SKA1-MID Band$\,$1+$\textit{Planck}\,$: $\sim 0.34\%$ on $w$, $\sim 0.22\%$ on $h$, $\sim 0.64\%$ on HI bias $b_{\rm HI}$, and an absolute uncertainty of about $3\times10^{-4}$ ($7\times10^{-4}$) on $\lambda_{1}$ ($\lambda_{2}$). Moreover, we quantify the effects from systematics of the redshift bin number, redshift-space distortions, foreground residuals and uncertainties on the measured HI fraction, $\Omega_{\mathrm{HI}}(z)$. Our results indicate a bright prospect for HI intensity mapping surveys in constraining IDE, whether on their own or further by synergies with other measurements.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Forecast on $f(R)$ Gravity with HI 21cm Intensity Mapping Surveys

    astro-ph.CO 2026-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Fisher forecasts show BINGO and SKA1-MID 21-cm intensity mapping, combined with Planck priors, could constrain the f(R) gravity parameter B0 down to ~10⁻⁶–10⁻⁸.

Pith tools