Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

ToolEyes: Fine-Grained Evaluation for Tool Learning Capabilities of Large Language Models in Real-world Scenarios

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.00741 v3 pith:ZSSPAYVH submitted 2024-01-01 cs.CL cs.AI

ToolEyes: Fine-Grained Evaluation for Tool Learning Capabilities of Large Language Models in Real-world Scenarios

classification cs.CL cs.AI
keywords toollearningllmsscenariostooleyescapabilitiestoolsalignment
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Existing evaluations of tool learning primarily focus on validating the alignment of selected tools for large language models (LLMs) with expected outcomes. However, these approaches rely on a limited set of scenarios where answers can be pre-determined, diverging from genuine needs. Furthermore, a sole emphasis on outcomes disregards the complex capabilities required for LLMs to effectively use tools. To tackle this issue, we propose ToolEyes, a fine-grained system tailored for the evaluation of the LLMs' tool learning capabilities in authentic scenarios. The system meticulously examines seven real-world scenarios, analyzing five dimensions crucial to LLMs in tool learning: format alignment, intent comprehension, behavior planning, tool selection, and answer organization. Additionally, ToolEyes incorporates a tool library boasting approximately 600 tools, serving as an intermediary between LLMs and the physical world. Evaluations involving ten LLMs across three categories reveal a preference for specific scenarios and limited cognitive abilities in tool learning. Intriguingly, expanding the model size even exacerbates the hindrance to tool learning. The code and data are available at https://github.com/Junjie-Ye/ToolEyes.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. MCP-Atlas: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Tool-Use Competency with Real MCP Servers

    cs.SE 2026-01 accept novelty 8.0

    MCP-Atlas is a new benchmark with 1000 tasks on production MCP servers that uses claim-level scoring to evaluate LLM agents on realistic multi-step tool-use competency.

  2. MCP-Atlas: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Tool-Use Competency with Real MCP Servers

    cs.SE 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    MCP-Atlas introduces a benchmark of 36 real MCP servers, 220 tools, and 1,000 natural-language tasks to measure LLM tool-use competency in multi-server workflows.

  3. NTILC: Neural Tool Invocation via Learned Compression

    cs.SE 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    NTILC replaces in-context tool registry lookup with learned latent retrieval using a signature-aware composite loss, reducing context consumption by over 95% and latency by up to 74%.

  4. GenoMAS: A Multi-Agent Framework for Scientific Discovery via Code-Driven Gene Expression Analysis

    cs.AI 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    GenoMAS deploys six specialized LLM agents with guided planning to preprocess transcriptomic data and identify genes, reaching 89.13% composite similarity and 60.48% F1 on the GenoTEX benchmark while outperforming pri...