Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

ChatGPT for Conversational Recommendation: Refining Recommendations by Reprompting with Feedback

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.03605 v1 pith:7K3FNXBJ submitted 2024-01-07 cs.IR cs.AIcs.CLcs.LG

classification cs.IRcs.AIcs.CLcs.LG
keywords chatgptrecommendationfeedbackrecommendationspopularityrepromptinguseralgorithms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Recommendation algorithms have been pivotal in handling the overwhelming volume of online content. However, these algorithms seldom consider direct user input, resulting in superficial interaction between them. Efforts have been made to include the user directly in the recommendation process through conversation, but these systems too have had limited interactivity. Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT have gained popularity due to their ease of use and their ability to adapt dynamically to various tasks while responding to feedback. In this paper, we investigate the effectiveness of ChatGPT as a top-n conversational recommendation system. We build a rigorous pipeline around ChatGPT to simulate how a user might realistically probe the model for recommendations: by first instructing and then reprompting with feedback to refine a set of recommendations. We further explore the effect of popularity bias in ChatGPT's recommendations, and compare its performance to baseline models. We find that reprompting ChatGPT with feedback is an effective strategy to improve recommendation relevancy, and that popularity bias can be mitigated through prompt engineering.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Survey of Foundation Model-Powered Recommender Systems: From Feature-Based, Generative to Agentic Paradigms

    cs.IR 2025-04 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey that organizes foundation-model recommender systems into feature-based, generative, and agentic paradigms and reviews tasks, empirical results, and open challenges.

  2. Multi-Type Context-Aware Conversational Recommender Systems via Mixture-of-Experts

    cs.CL 2025-04 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A learned gating chair coordinates separate conversation, knowledge-graph, and review experts, and the paper reports improved movie recommendation accuracy and response diversity on ReDial and INSPIRED.

Pith tools