Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Can Large Language Models Beat Wall Street? Unveiling the Potential of AI in Stock Selection

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.03737 v2 pith:3EPTUCTM submitted 2024-01-08 q-fin.CP cs.AIcs.CEcs.CLcs.LG

classification q-fin.CPcs.AIcs.CEcs.CLcs.LG
keywords financialinvestmentmarketsenseaidecision-makingframeworkgpt-4integratinglanguage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper introduces MarketSenseAI, an innovative framework leveraging GPT-4's advanced reasoning for selecting stocks in financial markets. By integrating Chain of Thought and In-Context Learning, MarketSenseAI analyzes diverse data sources, including market trends, news, fundamentals, and macroeconomic factors, to emulate expert investment decision-making. The development, implementation, and validation of the framework are elaborately discussed, underscoring its capability to generate actionable and interpretable investment signals. A notable feature of this work is employing GPT-4 both as a predictive mechanism and signal evaluator, revealing the significant impact of the AI-generated explanations on signal accuracy, reliability and acceptance. Through empirical testing on the competitive S&P 100 stocks over a 15-month period, MarketSenseAI demonstrated exceptional performance, delivering excess alpha of 10% to 30% and achieving a cumulative return of up to 72% over the period, while maintaining a risk profile comparable to the broader market. Our findings highlight the transformative potential of Large Language Models in financial decision-making, marking a significant leap in integrating generative AI into financial analytics and investment strategies.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. ContestTrade: A Multi-Agent Trading System Based on Internal Contest Mechanism

    q-fin.TR 2025-08 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    An LLM trading system that selects agents through an internal contest scored by a zero-intelligence trader and LightGBM predictions reports 52.8% returns and Sharpe 3.12 on A-shares over six months.

  2. Agentar-Fin-R1: Enhancing Financial Intelligence through Domain Expertise, Training Efficiency, and Advanced Reasoning

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Agentar-Fin-R1, an 8B and 32B financial LLM family, reports top scores on FinEval, FinanceIQ, and a new Finova benchmark while keeping general reasoning near its Qwen3 base.

  3. Predicting Business Angel Early-Stage Decision Making Using AI

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    An LLM-based version of the Critical Factor Assessment framework predicted Shark Tank deal outcomes with 85% accuracy and matched human CFA scores (Spearman r = 0.896) on 31 pitches.

  4. Integrating Large Language Models in Financial Investments and Market Analysis: A Survey

    q-fin.GN 2025-06 conditional novelty 1.0 of 10

    A survey that organizes recent LLM-in-finance research into four framework categories and summarizes the reported methods, datasets, and performance of about 30 systems.

Pith tools