REVIEW 10 cited by
How predictable is language model benchmark performance?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
How predictable is language model benchmark performance?
read the original abstract
We investigate large language model performance across five orders of magnitude of compute scaling in eleven recent model architectures. We show that average benchmark performance, aggregating over many individual tasks and evaluations as in the commonly-used BIG-Bench dataset, is decently predictable as a function of training compute scale. Specifically, when extrapolating BIG-Bench Hard performance across one order of magnitude in compute, we observe average absolute errors of 6 percentage points (pp). By contrast, extrapolation for individual BIG-Bench tasks across an order of magnitude in compute yields higher average errors of 18pp. Nonetheless, individual task performance remains significantly more predictable than chance. Overall, our work suggests compute scaling provides a promising basis to forecast AI capabilities in diverse benchmarks, though predicting performance in specific tasks poses challenges.
Forward citations
Cited by 10 Pith papers
-
EdgeBench: Unveiling Scaling Laws of Learning from Real-World Environments
Across ~38,000 hours on 134 ultra-long real-world tasks, aggregate agent performance follows a log-sigmoid of interaction time, and measured learning speed doubles about every three months.
-
The Art of Scaling Reinforcement Learning Compute for LLMs
A 400k+ GPU-hour study shows RL scaling in LLMs follows predictable sigmoidal trajectories, with most design choices affecting efficiency rather than the performance asymptote, enabling accurate large-scale prediction...
-
Validity Threats for Foundation Model Research
Maps common low-compute research strategies for foundation models onto statistical, internal, external, and construct validity threats via a causal-inference lens.
-
SuperValid: Capability-Aligned OOD Validation for Generalizable Downstream Scaling
SuperValid synthesizes capability-aligned OOD validation data to produce a training-free loss metric that correlates with downstream benchmark performance across model architectures, scales, and data distributions.
-
DECO: Sparse Mixture-of-Experts with Dense-Comparable Performance on End-Side Devices
DECO is a sparse MoE architecture with ReLU-based routing, learnable expert scaling, and NormSiLU activation that matches dense Transformer performance at 20% expert activation and delivers 2.93x speedup on Jetson AGX Orin.
-
DECO: Sparse Mixture-of-Experts with Dense-Comparable Performance on End-Side Devices
DECO sparse MoE matches dense Transformer performance at 20% expert activation with a 3x hardware inference speedup.
-
DECO: Sparse Mixture-of-Experts with Dense-Comparable Performance on End-Side Devices
DECO matches dense model performance at 20% expert activation via ReLU-based routing with learnable scaling and the NormSiLU activation, plus a 3x real-hardware speedup.
-
Two AI Metrics Diverged: Will it Make All the Difference?
Bounded performance metrics always favor convergence of AI capabilities to meek models while unbounded metrics allow frontier models to maintain leads indefinitely, with policy implications for capability concentration.
-
Humanity's Last Exam
Humanity's Last Exam is a new 2,500-question benchmark at the frontier of human knowledge where state-of-the-art LLMs show low accuracy.
-
Seed1.5-VL Technical Report
Seed1.5-VL is a compact multimodal model that sets new records on dozens of vision-language benchmarks and outperforms prior systems on agent-style tasks.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.