REVIEW 1 cited by
Hallucination Benchmark in Medical Visual Question Answering
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The recent success of large language and vision models (LLVMs) on vision question answering (VQA), particularly their applications in medicine (Med-VQA), has shown a great potential of realizing effective visual assistants for healthcare. However, these models are not extensively tested on the hallucination phenomenon in clinical settings. Here, we created a hallucination benchmark of medical images paired with question-answer sets and conducted a comprehensive evaluation of the state-of-the-art models. The study provides an in-depth analysis of current models' limitations and reveals the effectiveness of various prompting strategies.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
RadEyeVideo: Enhancing general-domain Large Vision Language Model for chest X-ray analysis with video representations of eye gaze
A video-based eye-gaze prompt improved report generation and diagnosis for one general-purpose vision-language model, LLaVA-OneVision, but hurt or barely helped two others, and the main comparison to medical models re...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.