Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Machine Translation with Large Language Models: Prompt Engineering for Persian, English, and Russian Directions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.08429 v1 pith:LZ4QCQP7 submitted 2024-01-16 cs.CL cs.AIcs.HCcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.HCcs.LG
keywords translationmachinellmslanguagemodelspromptingconsiderationsenglish
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Generative large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional proficiency in various natural language processing (NLP) tasks, including machine translation, question answering, text summarization, and natural language understanding. To further enhance the performance of LLMs in machine translation, we conducted an investigation into two popular prompting methods and their combination, focusing on cross-language combinations of Persian, English, and Russian. We employed n-shot feeding and tailored prompting frameworks. Our findings indicate that multilingual LLMs like PaLM exhibit human-like machine translation outputs, enabling superior fine-tuning of desired translation nuances in accordance with style guidelines and linguistic considerations. These models also excel in processing and applying prompts. However, the choice of language model, machine translation task, and the specific source and target languages necessitate certain considerations when adopting prompting frameworks and utilizing n-shot in-context learning. Furthermore, we identified errors and limitations inherent in popular LLMs as machine translation tools and categorized them based on various linguistic metrics. This typology of errors provides valuable insights for utilizing LLMs effectively and offers methods for designing prompts for in-context learning. Our report aims to contribute to the advancement of machine translation with LLMs by improving both the accuracy and reliability of evaluation metrics.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. TAPO: Task-Referenced Adaptation for Prompt Optimization

    cs.CL 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    TAPO is a prompt optimization framework that selects task-specific evaluation metrics and evolves prompts, reporting small and partly conflicting gains over four baselines on six reasoning datasets.

  2. Recursive Decomposition of Logical Thoughts: Framework for Superior Reasoning and Knowledge Propagation in Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-01 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A prompting framework that recursively decomposes reasoning tasks and self-scores candidate thoughts is reported to improve LLM accuracy on math and letter-concatenation benchmarks, though the headline improvement is ...

Pith tools