Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Concept Alignment

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.08672 v1 pith:HFPLAOJW submitted 2024-01-09 cs.LG cs.AIq-bio.NC

classification cs.LGcs.AIq-bio.NC
keywords alignmenthumansconceptconceptssystemsaligncognitiveexplain
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Discussion of AI alignment (alignment between humans and AI systems) has focused on value alignment, broadly referring to creating AI systems that share human values. We argue that before we can even attempt to align values, it is imperative that AI systems and humans align the concepts they use to understand the world. We integrate ideas from philosophy, cognitive science, and deep learning to explain the need for concept alignment, not just value alignment, between humans and machines. We summarize existing accounts of how humans and machines currently learn concepts, and we outline opportunities and challenges in the path towards shared concepts. Finally, we explain how we can leverage the tools already being developed in cognitive science and AI research to accelerate progress towards concept alignment.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Shifting Attention to You: Personalized Brain-Inspired AI Models

    q-bio.NC 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Fine-tuning CLIP with human behavioral embeddings and dynamic MEG responses yields models that better predict human similarity judgments and track individual neural dynamics over time.

Pith tools