REVIEW 1 cited by
DTMM: Deploying TinyML Models on Extremely Weak IoT Devices with Pruning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
DTMM is a library designed for efficient deployment and execution of machine learning models on weak IoT devices such as microcontroller units (MCUs). The motivation for designing DTMM comes from the emerging field of tiny machine learning (TinyML), which explores extending the reach of machine learning to many low-end IoT devices to achieve ubiquitous intelligence. Due to the weak capability of embedded devices, it is necessary to compress models by pruning enough weights before deploying. Although pruning has been studied extensively on many computing platforms, two key issues with pruning methods are exacerbated on MCUs: models need to be deeply compressed without significantly compromising accuracy, and they should perform efficiently after pruning. Current solutions only achieve one of these objectives, but not both. In this paper, we find that pruned models have great potential for efficient deployment and execution on MCUs. Therefore, we propose DTMM with pruning unit selection, pre-execution pruning optimizations, runtime acceleration, and post-execution low-cost storage to fill the gap for efficient deployment and execution of pruned models. It can be integrated into commercial ML frameworks for practical deployment, and a prototype system has been developed. Extensive experiments on various models show promising gains compared to state-of-the-art methods.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Real-Time Performance Benchmarking of TinyML Models in Embedded Systems (PICO: Performance of Inference, CPU, and Operations)
Measured latency, CPU, memory, and confidence for three TensorFlow Lite models on BeagleBone AI64 and Raspberry Pi 4; the Raspberry Pi 4 was faster and more resource-efficient in every test.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.