REVIEW 3 cited by
Large Language Models Are Neurosymbolic Reasoners
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
A wide range of real-world applications is characterized by their symbolic nature, necessitating a strong capability for symbolic reasoning. This paper investigates the potential application of Large Language Models (LLMs) as symbolic reasoners. We focus on text-based games, significant benchmarks for agents with natural language capabilities, particularly in symbolic tasks like math, map reading, sorting, and applying common sense in text-based worlds. To facilitate these agents, we propose an LLM agent designed to tackle symbolic challenges and achieve in-game objectives. We begin by initializing the LLM agent and informing it of its role. The agent then receives observations and a set of valid actions from the text-based games, along with a specific symbolic module. With these inputs, the LLM agent chooses an action and interacts with the game environments. Our experimental results demonstrate that our method significantly enhances the capability of LLMs as automated agents for symbolic reasoning, and our LLM agent is effective in text-based games involving symbolic tasks, achieving an average performance of 88% across all tasks.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Monte Carlo Planning with Large Language Model for Text-Based Game Agents
MC-DML uses GPT-3.5 as an MCTS action-prior policy with in-trial and cross-trial reflection memory, improving initial-planning scores on Jericho text games like Zork1, Deephome, and Ztuu.
-
Neuro-Symbolic Frameworks: Conceptual Characterization and Empirical Comparative Analysis
A facet-based comparison of DeepProbLog, Scallop, and DomiKnowS with efficiency measurements on four toy tasks, identifying challenges for future neurosymbolic frameworks.
-
Neuro-Symbolic AI in 2024: A Systematic Review
A systematic review of 158 Neuro-Symbolic AI papers finds research concentrated in learning and inference, with explainability, trustworthiness, and Meta-Cognition as underrepresented gaps.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.