Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Assessing and Understanding Creativity in Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.12491 v1 pith:YXG2TLFX submitted 2024-01-23 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords creativityllmsassessinglanguageoriginalitycreativeelaborationfindings
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In the field of natural language processing, the rapid development of large language model (LLM) has attracted more and more attention. LLMs have shown a high level of creativity in various tasks, but the methods for assessing such creativity are inadequate. The assessment of LLM creativity needs to consider differences from humans, requiring multi-dimensional measurement while balancing accuracy and efficiency. This paper aims to establish an efficient framework for assessing the level of creativity in LLMs. By adapting the modified Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking, the research evaluates the creative performance of various LLMs across 7 tasks, emphasizing 4 criteria including Fluency, Flexibility, Originality, and Elaboration. In this context, we develop a comprehensive dataset of 700 questions for testing and an LLM-based evaluation method. In addition, this study presents a novel analysis of LLMs' responses to diverse prompts and role-play situations. We found that the creativity of LLMs primarily falls short in originality, while excelling in elaboration. Besides, the use of prompts and the role-play settings of the model significantly influence creativity. Additionally, the experimental results also indicate that collaboration among multiple LLMs can enhance originality. Notably, our findings reveal a consensus between human evaluations and LLMs regarding the personality traits that influence creativity. The findings underscore the significant impact of LLM design on creativity and bridges artificial intelligence and human creativity, offering insights into LLMs' creativity and potential applications.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Dynamic Reinforcement Learning for Actors

    cs.LG 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A reinforcement learning update that adjusts each neuron's input-output sensitivity using TD error can replace external exploration noise and backpropagation through time in small actor-critic tasks.

  2. Generative Artificial Intelligence Extracts Structure-Function Relationships from Plants for New Materials

    cs.LG 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    A generative AI framework that reads plant structure-function literature, generates hypotheses, and produces a lab-validated pollen-based adhesive with measured shear strength.

  3. THiNK: Can Large Language Models Think-aloud?

    cs.CL 2025-05 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    THiNK uses a multi-agent, feedback-driven loop of problem revision and GPT-4O-based Bloom's Taxonomy scoring to measure and improve higher-order thinking in LLMs on math word problems.

  4. Advancing the Scientific Method with Large Language Models: From Hypothesis to Discovery

    cs.AI 2025-05 accept novelty 3.0 of 10

    A perspective review argues that LLMs should be deeply integrated into all stages of science, with human oversight and clear metrics, to become creative engines.

Pith tools