Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Visibility into AI Agents

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.13138 v6 pith:OL3WXAQV submitted 2024-01-23 cs.CY cs.AI

Visibility into AI Agents

classification cs.CY cs.AI
keywords agentsmeasuresrisksvisibilityexistinggovernancemitigatingstructures
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Increased delegation of commercial, scientific, governmental, and personal activities to AI agents -- systems capable of pursuing complex goals with limited supervision -- may exacerbate existing societal risks and introduce new risks. Understanding and mitigating these risks involves critically evaluating existing governance structures, revising and adapting these structures where needed, and ensuring accountability of key stakeholders. Information about where, why, how, and by whom certain AI agents are used, which we refer to as visibility, is critical to these objectives. In this paper, we assess three categories of measures to increase visibility into AI agents: agent identifiers, real-time monitoring, and activity logging. For each, we outline potential implementations that vary in intrusiveness and informativeness. We analyze how the measures apply across a spectrum of centralized through decentralized deployment contexts, accounting for various actors in the supply chain including hardware and software service providers. Finally, we discuss the implications of our measures for privacy and concentration of power. Further work into understanding the measures and mitigating their negative impacts can help to build a foundation for the governance of AI agents.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Governed Individuation: Cryptographically Decoupling an Agent's Learning from Its Authority

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5

    Governed individuation cryptographically freezes an agent's authority ceiling and gates every action by semantic effect, proving learning cannot widen permissions without an operator signature.

  2. HANSEL: Extracting Breadcrumbs from Web Agent Trajectories for Interactive Verification

    cs.HC 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    HANSEL extracts navigable evidence from agent trajectories with 83.7% precision and 88.8% recall on 45 tasks, reduces volume by 61.6%, and improves verification metrics in a 14-participant study.

  3. Toward Pre-Deployment Assurance for Enterprise AI Agents: Ontology-Grounded Simulation and Trust Certification

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The authors introduce a three-part ontology-based verification system for AI agents that generates regulatory and adversarial test scenarios and issues machine-verifiable trust certificates, with pilot results indicat...