Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Contracting with a Learning Agent

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.16198 v1 pith:JG4RSY67 submitted 2024-01-29 cs.GT cs.AIcs.LGecon.TH

classification cs.GTcs.AIcs.LGecon.TH
keywords agentcontractlearningprincipaltimeachieveagentsalpha
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Many real-life contractual relations differ completely from the clean, static model at the heart of principal-agent theory. Typically, they involve repeated strategic interactions of the principal and agent, taking place under uncertainty and over time. While appealing in theory, players seldom use complex dynamic strategies in practice, often preferring to circumvent complexity and approach uncertainty through learning. We initiate the study of repeated contracts with a learning agent, focusing on agents who achieve no-regret outcomes. Optimizing against a no-regret agent is a known open problem in general games; we achieve an optimal solution to this problem for a canonical contract setting, in which the agent's choice among multiple actions leads to success/failure. The solution has a surprisingly simple structure: for some $\alpha > 0$, initially offer the agent a linear contract with scalar $\alpha$, then switch to offering a linear contract with scalar $0$. This switch causes the agent to ``free-fall'' through their action space and during this time provides the principal with non-zero reward at zero cost. Despite apparent exploitation of the agent, this dynamic contract can leave \emph{both} players better off compared to the best static contract. Our results generalize beyond success/failure, to arbitrary non-linear contracts which the principal rescales dynamically. Finally, we quantify the dependence of our results on knowledge of the time horizon, and are the first to address this consideration in the study of strategizing against learning agents.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Should Decision-Makers Reveal Classifiers in Online Strategic Classification?

    cs.GT 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Hiding the classifier and letting agents best respond to a discounted average of past classifiers multiplies the deterministic worst-case mistake bound by about 1/(1-gamma) or by the maximum in-degree of the manipulat...

Pith tools