Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Good at captioning, bad at counting: Benchmarking GPT-4V on Earth observation data

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.17600 v1 pith:ZO4CK4VM submitted 2024-01-31 cs.CL cs.AIcs.CV

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.CV
keywords datatasksbenchmarkcountinglikevlmscaptioningearth
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have demonstrated impressive performance on complex tasks involving visual input with natural language instructions. However, it remains unclear to what extent capabilities on natural images transfer to Earth observation (EO) data, which are predominantly satellite and aerial images less common in VLM training data. In this work, we propose a comprehensive benchmark to gauge the progress of VLMs toward being useful tools for EO data by assessing their abilities on scene understanding, localization and counting, and change detection tasks. Motivated by real-world applications, our benchmark includes scenarios like urban monitoring, disaster relief, land use, and conservation. We discover that, although state-of-the-art VLMs like GPT-4V possess extensive world knowledge that leads to strong performance on open-ended tasks like location understanding and image captioning, their poor spatial reasoning limits usefulness on object localization and counting tasks. Our benchmark will be made publicly available at https://vleo.danielz.ch/ and on Hugging Face at https://huggingface.co/collections/mit-ei/vleo-benchmark-datasets-65b789b0466555489cce0d70 for easy model evaluation.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. BYO-Eval: Build Your Own Dataset for Fine-Grained Visual Assessment of Multimodal Language Models

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A Blender-based diagnostic toolkit that tests VLMs on fine-grained visual skills by varying one visual attribute at a time, exposing failure modes that coarse benchmarks miss.

  2. Pedestrian Intention Prediction via Vision-Language Foundation Models

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Time-aware vehicle-speed prompts improve vision-language model accuracy for pedestrian crossing intent, but the claimed edge over specialized vision models is not consistent across the paper's own benchmarks.

  3. Domain Specific Benchmarks for Evaluating Multimodal Large Language Models

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A review paper that organizes domain-specific MLLM benchmarks into an eight-discipline taxonomy, with summary tables and performance highlights.

Pith tools