REVIEW 4 cited by
Common Sense Reasoning for Deepfake Detection
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
State-of-the-art deepfake detection approaches rely on image-based features extracted via neural networks. While these approaches trained in a supervised manner extract likely fake features, they may fall short in representing unnatural `non-physical' semantic facial attributes -- blurry hairlines, double eyebrows, rigid eye pupils, or unnatural skin shading. However, such facial attributes are easily perceived by humans and used to discern the authenticity of an image based on human common sense. Furthermore, image-based feature extraction methods that provide visual explanations via saliency maps can be hard to interpret for humans. To address these challenges, we frame deepfake detection as a Deepfake Detection VQA (DD-VQA) task and model human intuition by providing textual explanations that describe common sense reasons for labeling an image as real or fake. We introduce a new annotated dataset and propose a Vision and Language Transformer-based framework for the DD-VQA task. We also incorporate text and image-aware feature alignment formulation to enhance multi-modal representation learning. As a result, we improve upon existing deepfake detection models by integrating our learned vision representations, which reason over common sense knowledge from the DD-VQA task. We provide extensive empirical results demonstrating that our method enhances detection performance, generalization ability, and language-based interpretability in the deepfake detection task.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
XPlainVerse: A Million-Scale Benchmark for Explainable Deepfake Detection
A million-scale deepfake benchmark with Edit-Check filtering, dual expert/lay explanations, and EntityScore/EvidenceScore shows fine-tuned detectors collapse under generator shift while surface fluency remains.
-
MGFFD-VLM: Multi-Granularity Prompt Learning for Face Forgery Detection with VLM
MGFFD-VLM combines quality-aware LoRA experts, multi-granularity prompts, and a three-stage training plan to improve explainable deepfake detection on the extended DD-VQA+ dataset.
-
Visual Language Models as Zero-Shot Deepfake Detectors
Zero-shot VLMs scored by normalized yes/no token probabilities beat most trained deepfake detectors on a new SimSwap dataset, and a lightly fine-tuned InstructBLIP is near-perfect on DFDC-P.
-
Unmasking Synthetic Realities in Generative AI: A Comprehensive Review of Adversarially Robust Deepfake Detection Systems
A systematic review of deepfake detection finds a pervasive lack of adversarial robustness evaluation across all modalities and calls for resilient, modality-agnostic detectors.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.