Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Common Sense Reasoning for Deepfake Detection

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.00126 v2 pith:JBQPEATE submitted 2024-01-31 cs.CV cs.CL

classification cs.CVcs.CL
keywords detectiondeepfakecommonsensetaskdd-vqaapproachesattributes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

State-of-the-art deepfake detection approaches rely on image-based features extracted via neural networks. While these approaches trained in a supervised manner extract likely fake features, they may fall short in representing unnatural `non-physical' semantic facial attributes -- blurry hairlines, double eyebrows, rigid eye pupils, or unnatural skin shading. However, such facial attributes are easily perceived by humans and used to discern the authenticity of an image based on human common sense. Furthermore, image-based feature extraction methods that provide visual explanations via saliency maps can be hard to interpret for humans. To address these challenges, we frame deepfake detection as a Deepfake Detection VQA (DD-VQA) task and model human intuition by providing textual explanations that describe common sense reasons for labeling an image as real or fake. We introduce a new annotated dataset and propose a Vision and Language Transformer-based framework for the DD-VQA task. We also incorporate text and image-aware feature alignment formulation to enhance multi-modal representation learning. As a result, we improve upon existing deepfake detection models by integrating our learned vision representations, which reason over common sense knowledge from the DD-VQA task. We provide extensive empirical results demonstrating that our method enhances detection performance, generalization ability, and language-based interpretability in the deepfake detection task.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. XPlainVerse: A Million-Scale Benchmark for Explainable Deepfake Detection

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5 of 10

    A million-scale deepfake benchmark with Edit-Check filtering, dual expert/lay explanations, and EntityScore/EvidenceScore shows fine-tuned detectors collapse under generator shift while surface fluency remains.

  2. MGFFD-VLM: Multi-Granularity Prompt Learning for Face Forgery Detection with VLM

    cs.CV 2025-07 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    MGFFD-VLM combines quality-aware LoRA experts, multi-granularity prompts, and a three-stage training plan to improve explainable deepfake detection on the extended DD-VQA+ dataset.

  3. Visual Language Models as Zero-Shot Deepfake Detectors

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Zero-shot VLMs scored by normalized yes/no token probabilities beat most trained deepfake detectors on a new SimSwap dataset, and a lightly fine-tuned InstructBLIP is near-perfect on DFDC-P.

  4. Unmasking Synthetic Realities in Generative AI: A Comprehensive Review of Adversarially Robust Deepfake Detection Systems

    cs.CR 2025-07 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A systematic review of deepfake detection finds a pervasive lack of adversarial robustness evaluation across all modalities and calls for resilient, modality-agnostic detectors.

Pith tools